Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

great news, thanks for taking care of this. Cheers. On 08/02/2018 12:57 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 09:20, Nyall Dawson wrote: > >> - I'd love to see us get below 25 open PRs (so that they fit on a >> single page on GitHub), but honestly I think it's probably not a >>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 09:20, Nyall Dawson wrote: > - I'd love to see us get below 25 open PRs (so that they fit on a > single page on GitHub), but honestly I think it's probably not a > realistic (or even desirable) goal for a project the size of QGIS. > Maintaining a queue size of between

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Il 22/06/2018 11:22, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto: > If I am not wrong the proposal to trade things for sponsorship levels > has been scheduled for the next PSC meeting? confirmed > I think this is a topic > which requires very careful evaluation! I agree totally. Thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini -

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

I'm superhappy to see it was worth the effort and having the queue down to a manageable size it feels indeed much better to review pull requests! I am also taking this as an opportunity to reflect on the current state of the project. I think we have seen an incredible improvement concerning

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Hi all, Il 22/06/2018 01:20, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 23:07, DelazJ wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Congratulations to all the cleaners! I can see that GitHub had for a moment >> reported 32 issues today and I'm pretty sure it'll go lower. > > Yep - we're now floating around

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 23:07, DelazJ wrote: > > Hi, > > Congratulations to all the cleaners! I can see that GitHub had for a moment > reported 32 issues today and I'm pretty sure it'll go lower. Yep - we're now floating around the 32 +/- 4 mark, depending on the time of day. I think we can

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Hi, Congratulations to all the cleaners! I can see that GitHub had for a moment reported 32 issues today and I'm pretty sure it'll go lower. When Nyall launched this "32 by 3.2" operation, I laughingly suggested to some people that in the Doc repo we also tried a "320 by 3.2" operation. We were

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On 19.06.2018 12:08, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Status report: we're at the new record low (in recent years) of 39 > open tickets... just 7 to go to hit this target! Thanks a lot devs! Cheers Marco -- Marco Bernasocchi QGIS.org Co-chair ma...@opengis.ch +41 (0)79 467 24 70

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On 2018-06-19 12:08, Nyall Dawson wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2018 at 22:27, Nyall Dawson wrote: On 8 May 2018 at 16:16, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 8 May 2018 at 09:15, Nyall Dawson wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It's no surprise to anyone familiar with the QGIS project that we've >> got an issue with the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On Fri, 11 May 2018 at 22:27, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > On 8 May 2018 at 16:16, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > On 8 May 2018 at 09:15, Nyall Dawson wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> It's no surprise to anyone familiar with the QGIS project that we've > >> got an issue with the Pull Request queue. It's been

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On 8 May 2018 at 16:16, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 8 May 2018 at 09:15, Nyall Dawson wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It's no surprise to anyone familiar with the QGIS project that we've >> got an issue with the Pull Request queue. It's been slowly growing >>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

+1 for a spring ponctual cleanup, but... this won't solve the long term issue of having enough ressources to assume review process. Do some of you already include a review and a documentation cost in your estimates ? Maybe QGIS.org could act as a third party to transfer those funds to a

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

I have added a new tag "Worth a revival" so we can safely close pull requests we'd like to remember! Le mar. 8 mai 2018 à 06:50, Luigi Pirelli a écrit : > this is my list that you can use to contact interested companies > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/6664 (any

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

this is my list that you can use to contact interested companies https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/6664 (any instituion, or directly boundless) and https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/6647 (any institution, boundless or geosolution that also had this problem) Luigi Pirelli

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Il 08/05/2018 11:14, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto: > Might be a good time to contact them and tell them about the benefits, > work already put into this (which would be a pity to loose) and let them > know what's required to make things happen. +1 who can do that? I'm available for help if

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On 05/08/2018 10:43 AM, Luigi Pirelli wrote: > I would close some my PRs that I've no time to work on, but I know there > are companies interested about that fixes. Would be fair they take care > of that. Just matter to setup a appopriate postgis/pki/docker setup to > reactivate some PKI tests.

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

+1 for all points... sorry to be not so helpful in this period doing my review part for lack of time I would close some my PRs that I've no time to work on, but I know there are companies interested about that fixes. Would be fair they take care of that. Just matter to setup a appopriate

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:15 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > It's no surprise to anyone familiar with the QGIS project that we've > got an issue with the Pull Request queue. It's been slowly growing > over time, recently hitting over 150 open requests! It's a bit of

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

ohh that reminds me I have 100 new things coming so I might just open a PR for all of those right now... :P On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 8 May 2018 at 09:15, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It's no surprise to

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Hi Nyall, Really good points in here. On 08.05.18 01:15, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > So I propose a "32 by 3.2" sprint, where we ALL collaboratively aim to > reduce the PR queue to <32 open requests before 3.2 release. Let's go! > 1., 2., 3., 4. They are all good ideas to reduce the size

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On 8 May 2018 at 09:15, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > It's no surprise to anyone familiar with the QGIS project that we've > got an issue with the Pull Request queue. It's been slowly growing > over time, recently hitting over 150 open requests! Progress report -

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Il 08/05/2018 01:15, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > So I propose a "32 by 3.2" sprint, where we ALL collaboratively aim to > reduce the PR queue to <32 open requests before 3.2 release. > Thoughts? It makes sense to me, thanks Nyall for raising this point. What worries me most is scaring away many

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

On 8 May 2018 at 14:39, James Shaeffer wrote: > I personally like this strategy, but as someone who is new to the project > and has made only one PR (which was merged rather quickly), how can I help? > > This seems to really only concern those who maintain the code, leaving

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

I personally like this strategy, but as someone who is new to the project and has made only one PR (which was merged rather quickly), how can I help? This seems to really only concern those who maintain the code, leaving many unable to do much. -- James On May 7, 2018 4:15:59 PM MST, Nyall

[QGIS-Developer] 32 by 3.2?

Hi all, It's no surprise to anyone familiar with the QGIS project that we've got an issue with the Pull Request queue. It's been slowly growing over time, recently hitting over 150 open requests! It's a bit of an embarrassment to the project (some of these PRs have been open for years!), and is