Il 20/02/2018 00:27, Alexandre Neto ha scritto:
> I agree. Adding sphinx anchors should be enough. Unless there are
> algorithms from different providers usinf the same identifier, because
> in sphinx we cannot have duplicated anchor's names.
OK, it makes sense.
Thanks Nyall.
--
Paolo Cavallini
I agree. Adding sphinx anchors should be enough. Unless there are
algorithms from different providers usinf the same identifier, because in
sphinx we cannot have duplicated anchor's names.
Nyall Dawson escreveu no dia segunda, 19/02/2018
às 22:40:
> On 19 February 2018
On 19 February 2018 at 18:09, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 18/02/2018 22:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>> Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a
>> summary of the current status list this!
>
> it wuld be nice if the small but annoying issue about
Il 18/02/2018 22:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a
> summary of the current status list this!
it wuld be nice if the small but annoying issue about modules with names
with spaces would be solved; Nyall, could the same approach you used
Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a summary of
the current status list this!
I hope soon someone van figure out how to document the SAGA processing tools!
Regards
Tim
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 16:30, matteo wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm
Hi all,
I'm writing here a brief summary of the current situation of the
Processing Help system.
Currently all the QGIS algorithms have been described and all the PR in
the doc repository have been merged (kudos to Harrissou for all the
reviews!).
Right now the Help button of each Processing