Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Hi Luigi Yes, thank you. With the help from someone on this mailing list, I was able to download. Regards Pieter ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

No problem Pieter, I don't think you have to apologize. Your question was the occasion to discuss this point indeed ;) Have you tried asking through their support channels? http://boundlessgeo.com/support/ Regards, Giovanni 2016-06-20 9:24 GMT+02:00 Pieter du Plooy : >

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

On 20 Jun 2016 8:04 AM, "Paolo Cavallini" wrote: > > > > > > Good to me, thanks Marco. > > > Il 19 giugno 2016 22:36:47 EEST, Marco Bernasocchi ha scritto: > > > > >> >> >> >> On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti <

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Good to me, thanks Marco. Il 19 giugno 2016 22:36:47 EEST, Marco Bernasocchi ha scritto: > > >On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti > wrote: >> >> >>"official" is better than "community" ? >> >>What is the preferred way? >> >>"Official" on

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > > >"official" is better than "community" ? > >What is the preferred way? > >"Official" on the contrary sounds a lot like bureocracy to me. > I think "just" QGIS. The other versions dhould be referred as

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

On 19-06-16 13:59, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > Official is the right word to me. Yep, to me too, all others are ... non-offical :-) Richard ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Official is the right word to me. On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 9:58 pm Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > Oh, gosh sorry, didn't know how to call them to distinguish clearly, > forgive me! And as Andreas said, my personal feeling is that something > "Community" has no less value than

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Oh, gosh sorry, didn't know how to call them to distinguish clearly, forgive me! And as Andreas said, my personal feeling is that something "Community" has no less value than anything else, on the contrary I value it more because it comes from a community instead of an individual or a company.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Hi, I agree with Jürgen and Matthieu - "community version" has kind of a negative touch. Although the original replier (Alessandro) probably did not intend/imply this. The official version from QGIS.ORG shouldn't be called "community version" - it is the "offical version". Andreas On

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Ok, no problem with having "custom" versions. I wouldn't call "community version" the official one for the same reasons exposed by others. I'm only concerned for the rise of questions similar to this post, where users ask for support on custom versions with the serious risk of great confusion.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Hi Mathieu, On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 15:57:05 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology. Same here - where "community version" is used it's often describes a crippled version that is missing some functionality. Jürgen [5 (in words: five)

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Hi, On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 16:09:16 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Paolo Cavallini > wrote: > > Il 19 giugno 2016 11:22:16 EEST, Pieter du Plooy > > ha scritto: > > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Well, first of all, there is officially no such thing as a "community version" (you can google qgis.org's main domain and documentation, you won't find a single mention or use of that term). There's also precedents in the open source world (MySQL comes to mind here) where a legal entity does a

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Interesting. May I know why? All the best. Il 19 giugno 2016 11:22:16 EEST, Pieter du Plooy ha scritto: >Tom > >No, it will not do, as I specifically need the Boundless version. > >Thank you anyway > >On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology. QGIS has an official version, found on qgis.org, and a number of flavors such as boundless :) On 19 Jun 2016 15:48, "Alessandro Pasotti" wrote: > It depends on what you mean with "fork", it is a fork in github sense

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

It depends on what you mean with "fork", it is a fork in github sense and it's here: https://github.com/boundlessgeo/QGIS Specifically: https://github.com/boundlessgeo/QGIS/tree/release-2_14-boundless The only differences are in the installer and in the particular commits that were included in

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

What are differences between the Boundless and the official version? I thought they only made a plugin to integrate it within their suite of services. I didn't know it was a fork! Giovanni Il 19/giu/2016 10:22 AM, "Pieter du Plooy" ha scritto: > Tom > > No, it will not

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Tom No, it will not do, as I specifically need the Boundless version. Thank you anyway On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin wrote: > Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any use? > > Tom > > > > -- > View this message in context: >

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any use? Tom -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Boundlessgeo-QGIS-tp5272336p5272339.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Qgis-developer

[Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

Hi guys Im posting this in the users and dev forums in the hope that someone who knows someone at Boundless reads this. I can contact them, but its probably out of normal hours, so will probably only get an answer tomorrow, and I need an answer quicker than that. I have been struggling in vain