http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Questions-regarding-new-geometry-engine-td5208770.html#a5209162
On 23.06.2015 05:58, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi
Recently I have been looking a bit at the new geometry classes and
there is one thing I do not understand: if QgsLineStringV2 is derived
from
Hi Marco
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Marco Hugentobler
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Questions-regarding-new-geometry-engine-td5208770.html#a5209162
Thanks - I thought this was already asked, but couldn't find where...
IMO the hierarchy in QGIS
Hi Martin
but is there a strong reason to deviate from
it?
Only a week reason ( clone() method ). But I think you are right and it
might be better to follow the ISO model to be more compatible with other
libs.
Regards,
Marco
On 23.06.2015 08:39, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi Marco
On Tue,
Hi
Recently I have been looking a bit at the new geometry classes and
there is one thing I do not understand: if QgsLineStringV2 is derived
from QgsCurveV2 and QgsPolygonV2 is derived from QgsSurfaceV2, why is
not the same approach used for multi-part geometries? Currently
QgsMultiLineStringV2
