#420 for ever !!!
:-)
https://99designs.it/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/420
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Logo-Update-tp5050419p5051127.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
#420 is really cool.
Maybe it would even look better with a little bit less of the 3D effect?
But definitely among my top favorites.
http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/420
On Fre 03 Mai 2013 11:38:22 CEST, skampus wrote:
#420 for ever !!!
:-)
still going for 50.
Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http://opengis.ch
On 03/05/2013, at 03:33 , Etienne Tourigny wrote:
I think it is my best and most straightforward work on the logo.
Hopefully, it doesn't look like anything else out there. :^)
[0]
#419 looks really nice. The bevel / gradients need to be a tiny more
discrete, but the overall feeling and direction is great.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
#412 and #419 look great -- they're my favourites of the contest so far!
Nyall
I like 413..It should look good on desktop too..in fact all designs from
412-420 are nice
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Logo-Update-tp5050419p5051137.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
#419 and #420 are really nice!
In 419 I think GIS could have a 3d effect like the Q
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Olivier Dalang olivier.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
If you search for logo evolution in google, you'll find a lot of
examples of logos being slightly refined rather than radically changed.
That would also be a way to go, which isn't explored at all in the contest
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
wrote:
I am not in favour of #338 or #336 because those are too complex
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Larry Shaffer
From: lar...@dakotacarto.com
To: radim.bla...@gmail.com
CC: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Logo Update
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com wrote:
On Wed
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Radim Blazek
On 03/05/2013, at 03:33 , Etienne Tourigny wrote:
I think it is my best and most straightforward work on the logo. Hopefully,
it doesn't look like anything else out there. :^)
[0]
https://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/419
I like it very much
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Please let me know if you have any feedback you would like me to leave on
the designs at
http://99designs.com.au/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397
My vote would go for #336, which I think has a better
: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:13:00 -0600
From: Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
To: Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com
Cc: QGIS Developer List qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Logo Update
Message-ID:
CA+nQOR_Zd4VS__7_ANTfZ=
rscqxemx7fotvxjpnpwmtegdu
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com wrote:
I am not in favour of #338 or #336 because those are too complex for
logo. And then, there seems to be 3 hands on it, right? I understand
that the green one is Wassermann's hand [1][2] but I wonder whose is
the blue
Hmmm. I had never heard of Wassermann's hand, so that's just a coincidence.
The hands represent dev's and user's hands, all working on the project
together, but from different parts of the world and from different
disciplines, which are represented by three elemental colors: brown
(geology,
I prefer #336
(http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/336)
over #338.
Could we have a version with more vibrant colors? I appreciate the story
behind the color selection but I still don't like the colors ...
The current darker grey could be much darker
Not #338 because the curved tail, the grided globe + the hands are not
usable for small icons (taskbar, favicon, etc.).
I'm rooting for #50/#308.
Maybe should we ask for a 16x16 version ?
Le 01/05/2013 06:29, Mathieu Pellerin a écrit :
New logos withdrawn.
My 2 cents:
I feel like design
Dnia środa, 1 maja 2013 o 09:44:20 Radim Blazek napisał(a):
OK, I just want to let you know that the first impression for somebody
who has not invented the logo may be different. I see three creatures,
Wassermann and his fellows trying to divide the Earth.
This is my second impression:
So it looks like #50 and a variation of Larry's stuff is the go at the
moment.
I will also note that once we pick a logo we will get the IP for the logo
so we can tweak the final logo to add or remove things.
- Nathan
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Borys Jurgiel li...@borysjurgiel.pl wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
wrote:
I am not in favour of #338 or #336 because those are too complex for
logo. And then, there seems to be 3 hands on it, right? I understand
Hi Larry, Devs,
While I generally have no problems with criticism, I do take issue
with having my work parodied in a cartoon which implies plagiarism.
A simple it looks too much like Chrome's icon would have sufficed.
I think it was not meant personally .. As far as I know Radim .. :)
There
From: werner.ma...@gmail.com
To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Logo Update
Hi Larry, Devs,
While I generally have no problems with criticism, I do take issue
with having my work parodied in a cartoon which implies plagiarism.
A simple it looks too much
. Antonio Locandro*
Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:37:23 +0200
From: werner.ma...@gmail.com
To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Logo Update
Hi Larry, Devs,
While I generally have no problems with criticism, I do take issue
with having
Hi again,
Have you guys that think #50 is more suitable for small icons actually tried
shrinking them to small sizes?
#50 is fine as a large icon, but when you shrink it right down as a small icon,
the triangle becomes so small that it pretty much disappears and you just have
a bland circle
Hi !
Actually, even if some of the proposed logos look good, there's none that I
like more than the current one.
Of course, that's because by seeing it and seeing it again, I grew attached
to it... But that counts too !!
By reading this thread, it seems that there's no proposal that
really
Hey all,
There is only one day left in the logo comp. I have already had the final
round extended three times so this is it. Please let me know if you have
any feedback you would like me to leave on the designs at
http://99designs.com.au/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/04/2013 13:11, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
Hey all,
There is only one day left in the logo comp. I have already had the final
round
extended three times so this is it. Please let me know if you have any
feedback you
would like me to
my favourites are:
still 280 followed by 50 and 338
nice logos anyway .. but in most of them i dislike the complete round O ..
in 280 i can understand the round most because of the compass lookalike
..
kind regard
werner
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/04/2013 13:11, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
Hey all,
There is only one day left in the logo comp. I have already had the final
round
extended three times so
On 30/04/2013, at 19:11 , Nathan Woodrow wrote:
Hey all,
There is only one day left in the logo comp. I have already had the final
round extended three times so this is it. Please let me know if you have any
feedback you would like me to leave on the designs at
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 30/04/2013 13:11, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
Hey all,
There is only one
I am not in favour of #338 or #336 because those are too complex for logo.
+1
I think #280 wihtout the hand, but with some shade on the colors instead, would
be nice and simple.
Otherwise I would go for the #50 without uantum
___
Qgis-developer
On 01/05/2013, at 03:47 , Stephane Goldstein wrote:
I am not in favour of #338 or #336 because those are too complex for logo.
+1
I think #280 wihtout the hand, but with some shade on the colors instead,
would be nice and simple.
+1.
(And it would still look more interesting than 50).
if i can say my opinion, my preference go to #338
s.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Logo-Update-tp5050419p5050555.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Qgis-developer
New logos have been submitted from Larry.
Feedback?
- Nathan
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:33 AM, skampus
stefano.cam...@regione.piemonte.itwrote:
if i can say my opinion, my preference go to #338
s.
--
View this message in context:
New logos withdrawn.
My 2 cents:
I feel like design #50 is overly generic. Simply logos are good, but
wondering whether this one went on the road of simplification to the
extreme, leaving a logo with a *slight* gap in meaningfulness. There could
be ways to remedy to that while keeping overall
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:13:00 -0600
From: Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.com
To: Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com
Cc: QGIS Developer List qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Logo Update
Message-ID:
CA+nQOR_Zd4VS__7_ANTfZ=rscqxemx7fotvxjpnpwmtegdu
38 matches
Mail list logo
