Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

Hi Andreas, ok, that's clear. You are right, that feature is only for the postgreSQL provider currently. I didn't see any missing requirement in SQLITE v3 - the requirement for GPKG - maybe Matthias knows more about that. We also use GDAL provider here, so we might miss some features there and

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1242] QuickPrint approval notification.

Plugin QuickPrint approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1242] QuickPrint 3.4.2" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/QuickPrint/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1350] Mascaret approval notification.

Plugin Mascaret approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1350] Mascaret 0.0.7 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Mascaret/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1214] Open eQuarter approval notification.

Plugin Open eQuarter approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1214] Open eQuarter 0.998a" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/mole/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [292] ZoomRC approval notification.

Plugin ZoomRC approval by pcav. The plugin version "[292] ZoomRC 0.5" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/zoomrc/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

Hi Great inputs below - we also have an open ticket to use a GitHub hook to auto-add feature entries which should make the process a little less tedious….. Thank you so much Regis and everyone else who has been helping with the changelog! Regards Tim > On 27 Feb 2018, at 15:01, DelazJ

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

Thanks Alessandro and Nyall, that said, it means that two reviewers are probably not found of having those PR integrated as is. Our community is based on consensus I think, Could we raise that topic up to the PSC level? Thoughts? Régis 2018-02-27 22:05 GMT+01:00 Nyall Dawson

[QGIS-Developer] Changelog entry for OTB and LIDAR tool from processing

Hi all, still trying to polish the changelog here. The entry for OOTB and lidar tool removal is really dry http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.0.0/#removed-otb-lidartools-providers-from-processing Could anyone explain the rationale and perspective of plugin provider. Sorry, I didn't

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

On 28 February 2018 at 06:40, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Luigi Pirelli wrote: >> >> > >> > On 27/02/2018 11:12, Mark Johnson wrote: >> that we get rid of the current provider and rely on GDAL only. >> >> >> >> With the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Luigi Pirelli wrote: > > > > On 27/02/2018 11:12, Mark Johnson wrote: > that we get rid of the current provider and rely on GDAL only. > >> > >> With the 'current provider' I assume you mean the Spatialite-Provider. > >> > >> Please

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector tiles

Tom, This has been somehow discussed in https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/7228 Bottom line is that the multi-scale approach of vector tiles doesn't fit well with the traditional scale-agnostic vector layer approach. So somehow you need to assign each vector tile zoom level to a cartographic

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

Hi, +1 with Richard. I spent some hours polishing the changelog on Sunday and the task is huge, I'll try to continue tonight. Maybe also we should explicit some tips: - Use Markdown syntax for a more readable changelog - Even is the feature is for developers, try to write something

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi Andreas, > ok, that's clear. You are right, that feature is only for the postgreSQL > provider currently. > > I didn't see any missing requirement in SQLITE v3 - the requirement for > GPKG - maybe Matthias

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

>> that we get rid of the current provider and rely on GDAL only. With the 'current provider' I assume you mean the Spatialite-Provider. Please remember that the Spatialite-Provider was never designed to support GeoPackage. Please also remember that Gdal/Ogr does not support all aspects of

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

Hi Mark, On 27/02/2018 11:12, Mark Johnson wrote: >>> that we get rid of the current provider and rely on GDAL only. > > With the 'current provider' I assume you mean the Spatialite-Provider. > > Please remember that the Spatialite-Provider was never designed to > support GeoPackage. > >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Where is www.qgis.org/wiki?

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:36 AM, wrote: > Hi, > Radim, would > https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/addinggrasstools.html be of > interest to you? Yes, that is what I was looking for. If it was moved here, the old wiki page is irrelevant. I have fixed the link

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

Just a quick note, I think I will deploy some updates (and some fixes !) on the changelog.qgis.org in 1 hour and 30 minutes. So don't edit around that time. Thanks 2018-02-27 11:42 GMT+03:00 Régis Haubourg : > Hi, +1 with Richard. > I spent some hours polishing the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Changelog for 3.2 now active

Hi I'm also +1 for a more described commit: things have improved this last year but still some "Unfortunately this naughty coder did not write a description... :-(" 2018-02-27 10:36 GMT+01:00 Etienne Trimaille : > Just a quick note, I think I will deploy some

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [597] NNJoin approval notification.

Plugin NNJoin approval by pcav. The plugin version "[597] NNJoin 3.0.4" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/NNJoin/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

>> Do you have a link to the issues? Does it ignore them or worse? The original report was 3 years ago and is still active: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/12479 It was also a topic of a QGIS Grant Applications - August 2016 'Correction of QgsOgrProvider implementaion of GDAL 2.0' A pull

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

2018-02-27 11:12 GMT+01:00 Mark Johnson : > >> that we get rid of the current provider and rely on GDAL only. > > With the 'current provider' I assume you mean the Spatialite-Provider. > > Please remember that the Spatialite-Provider was never designed to support >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

> > On 27/02/2018 11:12, Mark Johnson wrote: that we get rid of the current provider and rely on GDAL only. >> >> With the 'current provider' I assume you mean the Spatialite-Provider. >> >> Please remember that the Spatialite-Provider was never designed to >> support GeoPackage. >> >> Please

[QGIS-Developer] how to create a stand alone application with dlls and libs

Hello,i want to create an application with qgis3.0 myself,i just want to use the dll that are already be builded,so which should i download from the osgeo4w,i don't know which to choose ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1052] Projestions approval notification.

Plugin Projestions approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1052] Projestions 0.4.1 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/Projestions/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] QEP 112: Allow overwrite of QgsProject::homePath()

Hi all, Please see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/112 for a new proposal regarding allowing users to manually override the home path of projects. Comments/suggestions welcome! Nyall ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector tiles

> For display only, I guess merging is unnecessary - only cropping is > required. I believe it would be necessary for proper display of areas at least. Otherwise you get ugly straight lines cutting your geometries. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector tiles

Even Rouault-2 wrote > Otherwise you get ugly straight lines cutting your > geometries. I don't quite see why that would be the case, but I don't want to waste your time by implying that you should explain it to me. I'm new to vector tiles myself, and have a lot to learn. Really pleased to have

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector tiles

Many thanks, Even - I hadn't seen that ticket. Even Rouault-2 wrote > the multi-scale approach of vector tiles doesn't fit well with the > traditional scale-agnostic vector layer approach. So somehow you need to > assign each > vector tile zoom level to a cartographic scale range. See my

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

Hi I also think as generally policy supporting OGR is a better way to go where possible. Regards Tim > On 27 Feb 2018, at 23:29, Régis Haubourg wrote: > > Thanks Alessandro and Nyall, > that said, it means that two reviewers are probably not found of having those

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Is the apps\qgis folder cleared before installing a new QGIS version in osgeo4w?

Hi, Le 28 févr. 2018 00:17, Nyall Dawson a écrit : > > Hi all, (but specifically Jürgen!) > > I'm wondering if the existing content of the apps\qgis folder is > removed before a new QGIS version is install via osgeo4w? > > My suspicion is that it is not -- at least on a

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Is the apps\qgis folder cleared before installing a new QGIS version in osgeo4w?

On 28 February 2018 at 15:48, wrote: > Hi, > Le 28 févr. 2018 00:17, Nyall Dawson a écrit : >> >> Hi all, (but specifically Jürgen!) >> >> I'm wondering if the existing content of the apps\qgis folder is >> removed before a new QGIS version is install

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector tiles

Hi Tom, Areas in vector tiles are artificially cut into pieces. If you want to stroke the outlines of the areas you would not only get the wanted outlines of the original feature geometries, but in addition, also the unwanted, artificial, borders. And even if you just fill and don't stroke,

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1370] SentinelHub approval notification.

Plugin SentinelHub approval by pcav. The plugin version "[1370] SentinelHub 1.0" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SentinelHub/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Status of transaction support in Geopackages

Hi all, Thanks all for the discussion around Geopackages, SpatiaLite, etc. Not sure if the PSC can help here? To me it seems like many people would prefer that we invest into OGR to improve the Geopackage support - right? Isn't there consensus on that already? So - it would be a matter of

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [135] mmqgis approval notification.

Plugin mmqgis approval by pcav. The plugin version "[135] mmqgis 2018.2.27" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/mmqgis/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

[QGIS-Developer] Is the apps\qgis folder cleared before installing a new QGIS version in osgeo4w?

Hi all, (but specifically Jürgen!) I'm wondering if the existing content of the apps\qgis folder is removed before a new QGIS version is install via osgeo4w? My suspicion is that it is not -- at least on a desktop which previously had 2.18 installed via the qgis package and which was just