Il 13/01/2017 12:03, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> On 01/13/2017 11:54 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Il 13/01/2017 11:52, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
>>
>>> Agreed, do you know someone with experience and connections who could
>>> check with them how collaboration could work, especially
>>> also w.r.t.
On 01/13/2017 11:54 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 13/01/2017 11:52, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
>
>> Agreed, do you know someone with experience and connections who could
>> check with them how collaboration could work, especially
>> also w.r.t. to translation of algorithm documentation?
>
> doin
Il 13/01/2017 11:52, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> Agreed, do you know someone with experience and connections who could
> check with them how collaboration could work, especially
> also w.r.t. to translation of algorithm documentation?
doing it right now
thanks
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.
Hi Paolo
On 01/13/2017 11:43 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> What about translation?
>
> I'm not sure it is translated upstream - if not, however, it shuld be
> done at that level, it makes no sense to do it downstream.
Agreed, do you know someone with experience and connections who could
check w
Hi Matthias,
Il 13/01/2017 11:38, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> Are you referring to the quality of the upstream help?
yes
> My proposal offers to do both:
>
> * By default use the upstream help if quality is good enough
> * Override *where necessary*
agreed
> What about translation?
I'm no
Hi Paolo,
Are you referring to the quality of the upstream help?
My proposal offers to do both:
* By default use the upstream help if quality is good enough
* Override *where necessary*
What about translation?
Matthias
On 01/13/2017 11:26 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 13/01/2017 11:11, Ma
Il 13/01/2017 11:11, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
> What would also be nice if someone with experience and connections could
> check with saga, grass, etc. how collaboration could work, especially
> also w.r.t. to translation of algorithm documentation.
IMHO the GRASS help is fine as it is, and shou
Hi Matteo,
Yes, this is the idea as far as I understand.
What's missing is the concept.
Here a proposal:
* Add a new helpTag property to the processing GeoAlgorithm class
* Set the help tag to something like
processing_algs/saga/grid_analysis/aggregation-index
* Within our documentation
Hi devs,
I saw the PR to improve/start the QGIS Generic Help system [0], thanks Alex!
I was just thinking a way to take advantages of this new method for
improving the help files of Processing, especially for SAGA.
I know I'm boring, but IMHO having super algorithm without any guide on
the input
