Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] [Qgis-community-team] QGIS webserver size vs publishing old docs

2023-03-24 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer
But with what purpose? These are sites >7GB each of which most information should either be still available in newer doc versions, or only if you would want to use 2.x versions of QGIS... I fail to want to put extra time into this. But if you want: I have archived both versions in a zip on

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] [Qgis-community-team] QGIS webserver size vs publishing old docs

2023-03-23 Thread Serkan Girgin via QGIS-Developer
Hi all, Instead of deleting, would you consider putting the old documentation to a repository, e.g. Zenodo, so that they are archived for long term? Zenodo allows up to 50GB for each record and it is free. You can also create a community page, so that all records are accessible from a single

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] [Qgis-community-team] QGIS webserver size vs publishing old docs

2023-03-21 Thread WhereGroup
Thank you! I am also in Den Bosch and so I would love to join the discussion there, hopefully with valuable contributions and solutions :)) Cheers, Hannes Am 21.03.23 um 09:48 schrieb DelazJ via QGIS-Developer: Hi, Thanks all for the feedback I second the (somewhat reformulated by myself)

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] [Qgis-community-team] QGIS webserver size vs publishing old docs

2023-03-21 Thread DelazJ via QGIS-Developer
Hi, Thanks all for the feedback I second the (somewhat reformulated by myself) opinion that we shouldn't just buy space or disk because we would be financially able to do so. Not sure it is a sustainable behavior and we'd just be postponing the issue (remember, pyqgis repo is also concerned). We