2011/3/23 Mikhail Tchernychev mi...@mail.geometrics.com:
I re-installed latest released version 1.6.0 and it has DXF in place.
It also shows that it is using GDAL /OGR 1.7.3
In fact ldd shows that it is linked vs. both 1.7.0 and 1.6.0 GDAL libs (?)
Does it mean that development tree
I'm experiencing a crash similar to the one described in Ticket #3326.
The ticket is closed and states Fixed in r14934.
How can I know if r14934 is 1.6 or 1.7? If it's fixed for 1.7 it's ok,
but if the comment claims that the ticket is solved for 1.6, then it's not true,
as I'm getting a crash
Ramon,
I loaded the gsb files as you suggested. The grids now load into the
correct position (correct enough for me anyway). Thats a great
achievement right there.
The exported projection files (prj) look a bit odd. The segment
DATUM[D_unknown makes me a little nervous, however as I don't
Hi Sören,
That was a nice tutorial. I look forward to trying this approach out on my
system.
Regards,
John
On Mar 21, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Soeren Gebbert wrote:
Hello,
IMHO the WPS (web processing service) approach to use GRASS GIS within
QGIS might be a better solution? All the location,
Hi
I remember the QGIS was attaching a DPI parameter for every wms request, e.g.
DPI=96 when using wms layers in the mapcanvas or DPI=300 for printing. This
parameter is not attached anymore. Does this happen on purpose?
regards
Stefan
Mit freundlichem Gruss
Stefan Ziegler
Leiter amtliche
Hi
Is anyone working on adding WebGL support to QGIS? It could, for example, be
used for exporting a project to an advanced web site. For more information
and quite a few WebGL examples, have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebGL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebGL
I had a look at them when I was trying to work out why some imported text
wasn't correctly reporting its CRS. They look like pretty strange to me, but
since I could open the project on a linux and win7 in different computers with
identical results I was happy at that.
It's unlikely I'll get
Ramon,
Loaded your shape files into ARCGIS. It recognised none of the
projections defaulting to WGS84 every time.
Attached are a couple of prj files generated by ARCGIS. These look much
nicer.
With any luck, all these issues will be sorted in the major release of
1.7 due at the end of this
