Hi Alex,
On Wed, 13. Apr 2016 at 11:33:30 -0700, Alex M wrote:
> Yes there are plans. Looks like that list isn't archived on nabble.
Why Nabble?
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ubuntu/2016-February/001382.html
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel.
On 04/13/2016 10:16 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Randal,
>
> On Wed, 13. Apr 2016 at 12:59:40 -0400, Randal Hale wrote:
>> I hate to ask, I was checking fedora last night and they are up to
>> at least gdal 2.0. Osgeo4w is at 2.02. Ubuntu seems to be in a happy
>> spot with 1.11.2. Are
Hi Randal,
On Wed, 13. Apr 2016 at 12:59:40 -0400, Randal Hale wrote:
> I hate to ask, I was checking fedora last night and they are up to
> at least gdal 2.0. Osgeo4w is at 2.02. Ubuntu seems to be in a happy
> spot with 1.11.2. Are there any plans to move to gdal 2.0 on
> Ubuntu/UbuntuGIS
I hate to ask, I was checking fedora last night and they are up to at
least gdal 2.0. Osgeo4w is at 2.02. Ubuntu seems to be in a happy spot
with 1.11.2. Are there any plans to move to gdal 2.0 on Ubuntu/UbuntuGIS
anytime soon. I'm tempted to start compiling my own packages but that's
more
