I used to use Manifold a lot, as that's what I originally learned on.
Still would, but been making a concerted effort to stick with FOSS tools.
But yes, Manifold has, and seems to be further developing their GPU
capabilities. Mike Sumner has even been developing an R package to
interface with Mani
Good for you!
I would like to try Manifold... they have a lot of GPU computing I would
like to see in Qgis.
Cheers!
Nicolas
On Jul 20, 2016 09:31, "berndv. [via OSGeo.org]"
wrote:
Hi folk,
just caught the guy responsible for the data, and he
Hi folk,
just caught the guy responsible for the data, and he said that they were
wrongly exported from Manifold (seems to be quite tricky), so they still
appear on place in Manifold, but not in other systems.
Received new data that fit.
Thanx for helping
Bernd
Am 19.07.2016, 21:05 Uhr, sc
Am 20.07.2016 um 08:28 schrieb Andre Joost:
Am 19.07.2016 um 21:05 schrieb Bernd Vogelgesang:
Hi,
we just received some shapes accompanied by an xml and no prj.
So far I was out of luck finding the proper projection for this, but I'm
guessing that this stuff is from Manifold (my first contact wi
That's what I think also. The data are probably within a locally defined system. If not, the EPSG code would have been named during export. Any chance to get more information's from the author of the data?
Thg
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit WEB.DE Mail gesendet.Am 20.
Am 19.07.2016 um 21:05 schrieb Bernd Vogelgesang:
Hi,
we just received some shapes accompanied by an xml and no prj.
So far I was out of luck finding the proper projection for this, but I'm
guessing that this stuff is from Manifold (my first contact with that)
Can anyone tell me from the xml wha
Very cool! Thanks for pointing that plugin out
Nicolas
On Jul 19, 2016 16:26, "Paolo Cavallini [via OSGeo.org]"
wrote:
Hi,
have you tried the new plugin projestion? It may be of help in your case.
All the best. Il 19 luglio 2016 23:2
Hi,
have you tried the new plugin projestion? It may be of help in your case.
All the best.
Il 19 luglio 2016 23:24:24 EEST, Bernd Vogelgesang
ha scritto:
>Am 19.07.2016, 21:53 Uhr, schrieb Nicolas Cadieux
>:
>
>>
>> I imagine you have tried
>> 5243
>> 4839
>> 31491 to 31495?
>No, I haven't ti
Am 19.07.2016, 21:53 Uhr, schrieb Nicolas Cadieux
:
I imagine you have tried
5243
4839
31491 to 31495?
No, I haven't till now, cause I had no idea of them (the first 2)
5243 is the only one which does not end up in the Atlantic Ocean, but has
an offset of around 200 km to the north !
So
Can you send over a shape file without risking confidential information leaks?
On Jul 19, 2016 15:30, "berndv. [via OSGeo.org]"
wrote:
Hi, the location, more or less North Latitude 49.17048 West Longitude
10.66154
I imagine you have tried
5243
4839
31491 to 31495?
You could also look for Germany in https://epsg.io They have 129 CRS for
Germany...
On Jul 19, 2016 15:27, "berndv. [via OSGeo.org]"
wrote:
Am 19.07.2016, 21:19 Uhr, schrieb Nicolas Cadie
Hi,
the location, more or less
North Latitude 49.17048
West Longitude 10.66154
South Latitude 49.06307
East Longitude 10.81879
Cheers
Bernd
Am 19.07.2016, 21:39 Uhr, schrieb Bernd Vogelgesang
:
Am 19.07.2016, 21:19 Uhr, schrieb Nicolas Cadieux
:
Tried looking for it but no luck. It w
Am 19.07.2016, 21:19 Uhr, schrieb Nicolas Cadieux
:
Tried looking for it but no luck. It would help if you could say where
the data is supposed to be. Then you could try to look in
>www.epsg-registry.org .
Nicolas
Hi Nicolas,
thanks a lot for trying.
The shapes are situated around Gunz
Tried looking for it but no luck. It would help if you could say where the data
is supposed to be. Then you could try to look in www.epsg-registry.org .
Nicolas
On Jul 19, 2016 2:48 PM, "berndv. [via OSGeo.org]"
wrote:
Hi,
we just received som
14 matches
Mail list logo