Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with size() is that it would have to execute the Query,
Well, then that would trigger a follow up question; When is the Query
executed, and should there be a way to re-execute?
I
Michael Sick wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I mean size(), find() and iterator() could all trigger the query, but
there is one small difference...
size() need to return the number of objects that a non-bounded (with
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sick wrote:
With the disclaimer that I'm a total outsider, non-contributor, I think
that
count() would be more clear in intentions than size(). In both its noun and
verb form it makes sense.
That makes
Lovely:) So just need size:)
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's used quite a lot. Having a minimum of knowlegde of the query
api. Below are a sniplet of how a sortable dataprovider could be
4 matches
Mail list logo
