On 2010-12-09 16.01, Paul Merlin wrote:
Would it be possible to mirror the Schedules and Tasks as JMX MBeans?
With the latest stuff I did on that it would be really nice if all admin
could be done through JMX really.
I did not think about this. Do you mean exposing entities as JMX MBeans ?
Gang,
To keep you informed, Qi4j Scheduler implementation is going well. I'm writing
it externally before importing code in qi4j-librar...@develop so the code
history will be simple. I hope to be able to do it this weekend or next week. I
would like to explain you the way I made it to gather
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Paul Merlin p...@nosphere.org wrote:
To keep you informed, Qi4j Scheduler implementation is going well. I'm writing
it externally before importing code in qi4j-librar...@develop so the code
history will be simple.
Don't worry about history :-)
I'd rather see
Quoting Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Paul Merlin p...@nosphere.org wrote:
To keep you informed, Qi4j Scheduler implementation is going well. I'm
writing it externally before importing code in qi4j-librar...@develop so
the code history will be simple.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation
of a Composite with the new refactoring and all I can say is: OMG OMG
OMG OMG!!!
Very nice!
*Twiddling thumb*
j/k
Regards,
Edward Yakop
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation
of a Composite with the new refactoring and all I can say is: OMG OMG
OMG OMG!!!
+1
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation
of a Composite
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think we should tag/release the existing stuff as 0.2.0, and make this a
0.3
effort.
Alright, makes sense. Can you do that? I'll commit what I have after that.
/Rickard
___
qi4j-dev mailing list
qi4j-dev@lists.ops4j.org
+1 :)
Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
+1
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Alright, I just managed to
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:26, Rickard Öberg wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think we should tag/release the existing stuff as 0.2.0, and make this
a 0.3 effort.
Alright, makes sense. Can you do that? I'll commit what I have after that.
The prepare stage is complete, which means you can
+1 for the commit
and
+1 for the style
this is:
law of demeter
single responsibility
layering
separation of concerns
no unneccessary publishing of internal state/structure/implementation
details
but publishing of business-methods on the interfaces
* what perhaps can be moved is the
11 matches
Mail list logo