Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress of Qi4j Scheduler

2010-12-09 Thread Rickard Öberg
On 2010-12-09 16.01, Paul Merlin wrote: Would it be possible to mirror the Schedules and Tasks as JMX MBeans? With the latest stuff I did on that it would be really nice if all admin could be done through JMX really. I did not think about this. Do you mean exposing entities as JMX MBeans ?

[qi4j-dev] Progress of Qi4j Scheduler

2010-12-08 Thread Paul Merlin
Gang, To keep you informed, Qi4j Scheduler implementation is going well. I'm writing it externally before importing code in qi4j-librar...@develop so the code history will be simple. I hope to be able to do it this weekend or next week. I would like to explain you the way I made it to gather

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress of Qi4j Scheduler

2010-12-08 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Paul Merlin p...@nosphere.org wrote: To keep you informed, Qi4j Scheduler implementation is going well. I'm writing it externally before importing code in qi4j-librar...@develop so the code history will be simple. Don't worry about history :-) I'd rather see

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress of Qi4j Scheduler

2010-12-08 Thread Paul Merlin
Quoting Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Paul Merlin p...@nosphere.org wrote: To keep you informed, Qi4j Scheduler implementation is going well. I'm writing it externally before importing code in qi4j-librar...@develop so the code history will be simple.

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Edward Yakop
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation of a Composite with the new refactoring and all I can say is: OMG OMG OMG OMG!!! Very nice! *Twiddling thumb* j/k Regards, Edward Yakop

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote: Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation of a Composite with the new refactoring and all I can say is: OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Alin Dreghiciu
+1 On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote: Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation of a Composite

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Rickard Öberg
Niclas Hedhman wrote: I think we should tag/release the existing stuff as 0.2.0, and make this a 0.3 effort. Alright, makes sense. Can you do that? I'll commit what I have after that. /Rickard ___ qi4j-dev mailing list qi4j-dev@lists.ops4j.org

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
+1 :) Alin Dreghiciu wrote: +1 On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote: Alright, I just managed to

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:26, Rickard Öberg wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: I think we should tag/release the existing stuff as 0.2.0, and make this a 0.3 effort. Alright, makes sense. Can you do that? I'll commit what I have after that. The prepare stage is complete, which means you can

Re: [qi4j-dev] Progress

2008-05-28 Thread Michael Hunger
+1 for the commit and +1 for the style this is: law of demeter single responsibility layering separation of concerns no unneccessary publishing of internal state/structure/implementation details but publishing of business-methods on the interfaces * what perhaps can be moved is the