Ahh, thanks for the clarification. I always thought, that it was in fact
just the pointer i/f, which was used.
Yes, the loose menu item select was done in Basic of course (ok, therefor
CURSEN/CURDIS, if no PE is present), but how did they manage the outline
of the loose item, when the pointer
In message 08288672-59e3-469a-ad80-e6f0babb5...@jdh-stech.com, James
Hunkins j...@jdh-stech.com writes
Hi Jim,
Yes ... but only after you have logged yourself in, if connected to the
internet in some way or other.
Nice to hear from you again though ... :-)
Any work taking place on QDT
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
many years ago, I was thinking about the way, QLib handles it's own
Applikation Window under PE. I do not really think, it heavily uses WMAN,
but I always wanted to know, how it does, what it does.
Actually it doesn't use WMAN at all. They've implemented their own
little
Evening Malcolm,
Is it really not secure to have no password entrance to use a computer
that is for personal use ?
Possibly not, however, are you in total control of your computer at all
times? If yes are you 100% sure?
It is only with the advance of networked systems that password entrance
Evening Dilwyn,
OK, British-Rail style wrong type of security then.
:-)
We had the wrong snow today!
Ah, so NOT the fault of IE itself then!
Yes and no. Windows is insecure. IE is insecure. Outlook [express or
otherwise] is insecure. All are set up with defaults that allow your PC
to be
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Online Quanta Subscriptions
Yes and no. Windows is insecure. IE is insecure. Outlook [express or
otherwise] is insecure. All are set
Geoff Wicks wrote:
- Original Message - From: Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Online Quanta Subscriptions
Yes and no. Windows is insecure. IE is insecure. Outlook [express or
otherwise] is
