Although local, I wasn't able to attend the AGM; I'm surprised that
there hasn't been a word about it here. Did it actually happen?
Bryan H
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Yes it did, there were a number of pictures posted on the forum with brief
details.
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 Apr 2013, at 11:38, Bryan Horstmann b...@newlan.org wrote:
Although local, I wasn't able to attend the AGM; I'm surprised that there
hasn't been a word about it here. Did it
Some pictures here, from Lee and myself:
http://www.qlforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=12t=523
Dilwyn
-Original Message-
From: Lee Privett
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:17 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] AGM
Yes it did, there were a number of pictures posted
Number 6 is not a proper resolution as you cannot vote for a generalisation.
It is ambiguous. It must be a properly defined motion, eg Increase Membership
Fees to £20
Whatever is proposed you must be able to say Ay or Nay to it.
Number 7 is also ambiguous.
If you wish to replace the constitution
The Gilpins wrote:
The Stop Press attachment didn't seem to go through (at least it didn't
comeback to me so I am copying it here:
STOP PRESS
Update on AGM Workshop in Manchester, April 17th/18th
Opening 1.00pm on Saturday.
Dinner 7.30 for 8.00pm
Sunday 10.00 am - AGM time TBA
A
Tony Firshman wrote:
It was a pity the last Quanta was so incomplete (8-(#
I think that's being a bit unfair to the acting editor.
Pages 23 24 seem to have all the relevant info.
John
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 at 16:26:12, John Hall wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman wrote:
It was a pity the last Quanta was so incomplete (8-(#
I think that's being a bit unfair to the acting editor.
Pages 23 24 seem to have all the relevant info.
I assumed the last edition was the
