Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2011-11-09 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:27 PM To: ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches On 08/11/11 20:24, Norman Dunbar wrote: Evening Geoff, I believe you already have

[Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2011-11-08 Thread Geoff Wicks
Just a reminder that the deadline for the next issue of QL Today is next Tuesday 15th November. We want to keep to schedule this time so all readers get the magazine before Christmas. Fortunately we have had several early contributions, but not yet enough for a complete magazine. Also as it

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2011-11-08 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening Geoff, I believe you already have something from me that was held over from the last issue? I certainly hope so. Perhaps as a news item you might like to note the following: Both George Gwilt and myself - but mostly George - have been updating http://qdosmsq.dunbar-it.co.uk with

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2011-11-08 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 08/11/11 20:24, Norman Dunbar wrote: Evening Geoff, I believe you already have something from me that was held over from the last issue? I certainly hope so. Could have sworn I sent that to Geoff and not to the list. Oh well, my secrets are out - if I have any! ;-) Cheers, Norm. PS.

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2011-11-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Could have sworn I sent that to Geoff and not to the list. Oh well, my secrets are out - if I have any! ;-) ...or is that your [QDOS] Internals are out... Dilwyn ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-11-10 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Geoff, I know some of our readers have only had their QL Today for just over a week, but the deadline for issue 2 is next Sunday 16th November. Ha! I'm not worried this time because I know I've sent you two articles! So I refuse to panic this time. ... and the start of a new series

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-11-10 Thread Geoff Wicks
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: QL-Users list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 9:32 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches ... and the start of a new series although I am not revealing the content. Intriguing . I wonder

[Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-11-09 Thread Geoff Wicks
I know some of our readers have only had their QL Today for just over a week, but the deadline for issue 2 is next Sunday 16th November. Coming up in issue 2 we have another full news section, more on pointer programming and the start of a new series although I am not revealing the content.

[Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-02-03 Thread gwicks
Just a reminder that the QL Today deadline is a week away, 10th February. We have some good, varied and interesting material in, but probably not quite enough to fill an issue. As we have two lengthy articles short contributions would be welcome. At the moment the news section look like being

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-02-03 Thread Tony Firshman
gwicks wrote: At the moment the news section look like being a little sombre, What is sombre? so some more news items to lighten the news pages would be welcome, I am afraid I cannot lighten the scene. I am having to stop any active QL work (and adverts) as I am far too busy. I will still

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-02-03 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches gwicks wrote: At the moment the news section look like being a little sombre, What is sombre? so some more news

Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-02-03 Thread Tony Firshman
gwicks wrote: snip Fully understood. In fact we have spoken about this situation many times at shows. Your contribution has been much appreciated and has been far wider that just TF Services, Whoops - I forgot to reply privately. I am certainly not disappearing, but am simply recognising