IThere was a Stewart or maybe a Stuart of Sawston nr Cambridge, worked at
Team, Royston (where Johnathen Oakley went).
He built a motherboard for the QL system, FLP included on board.
Whatever came of thet, II've seen no mention of it since ?
___
I would prefer a 68xxx based solution as I am a retro hardware fan... But a
FPGA is close enough :-)
What kind of price are we talking here... I know that I would buy anything that
gives me faster speed than a superGoldCard and that is $300 or less.
I have no interest in an emulated solution.
Hi all,
So here's the state of play in designing new QL replacements...
Peter Graf is bogged down with some issues on his board. It has a decent
spec but it doesn't currently work in a meaningful sense. He has various
obstacles (working alone) that mean his design will be delayed or not
On 11 Mar 2011, at 22:38, Dave Park wrote:
A genuine 680X0:
+ compatibility, already designed
- availability and price
Aren't these obsolescent or obsolete?
An emulated 680X0 in FPGA form:
+ highly configurable, offers single chip solution, 68k VHDL sources in
public domain, very low
Hi all,
So here's the state of play in designing new QL replacements...
Peter Graf is bogged down with some issues on his board. It has a decent
spec but it doesn't currently work in a meaningful sense. He has various
obstacles (working alone) that mean his design will be delayed or not
...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...
If someone can make an FPGA happen, I can make PCBs happen, then someone can
make the OS happen, then we have a computer.
Of course, you could always decide that QPCII or Q-emuLator
-Users] QL replacements - state of play...
If someone can make an FPGA happen, I can make PCBs happen, then someone can
make the OS happen, then we have a computer.
Of course, you could always decide that QPCII or Q-emuLator would replace
that - they will always be faster :) However
