On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
> Well, the code only has the right timing from ROM as RAM is usually
> slower. Same would be true for MDV code.
>
That'll stop being true when we copy ROM to 32 bit wide RAM. ;)
However, I'm asking m
That is great! As one of the - apparently rare - QL-Net users a special thank
you from the neighborhood.
Tobias
> Am 04.03.2018 um 16:59 schrieb Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
> :
>
> I have released a new (or actually two new) versions of TK2.
>
> One versions only includes the timing critical p
Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote:
> As I am working on accelerated boards, would you be willing to outline the
> tuning/timing issues and what code needs editing to achieve correct
> performance?
Well, the code only has the right timing from ROM as RAM is usually
slower. Same would be true for MDV cod
Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
> I have released a new (or actually two new) versions of TK2.
Due to feedback from Markus I found another SMSQ/E-dependant code part
in ED that I have now removed. I have updated the files.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing
Marcel,
As I am working on accelerated boards, would you be willing to outline the
tuning/timing issues and what code needs editing to achieve correct
performance? How do you test? By successive approximation, or using a
calculation?
EG: Issue 8 runs the logic at 8MHz and the 8049 has a standard
I have released a new (or actually two new) versions of TK2.
One versions only includes the timing critical parts of the QL-NET
code and the rest can be LRESPRed afterwards.
The other versions included the complete QL-NET code and misses the
"ED" SuperBasic editor instead, which can be LRESPRed a
