In message 4e463c23.8010...@dunbar-it.co.uk, Norman Dunbar
nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk writes
On 12/08/11 22:28, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
I guess I must be a little 'lossy' then ... :-) ... for using JPEG's.
I see in your example that your photo's are 12 Mpixels per image, as
JPEGs ... phew ! So
On Aug 11, at 08:11 | Aug11, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Greetings from a very wet and dreich Leeds! (Look it up
URL:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dreich
On 11/08/11 06:12, Computer Research Centrum, Ltd wrote:
No JPEGs please! No lossy compression!
For computer screenshots the
On 12/08/11 22:28, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
I guess I must be a little 'lossy' then ... :-) ... for using JPEG's.
I see in your example that your photo's are 12 Mpixels per image, as
JPEGs ... phew ! So what size are they as PNG's?
Ok, as Jpegs they vary from about 500KB to around 3 MB. As PNGs
In message 20110811071213.c1dcd...@centrum.cz, Computer Research
Centrum, Ltd computer.resea...@centrum.cz writes
Umm ... media wars ... :-)
It is useful to convert images to 640 x 480 pixels, for web page display
- as JPEG files - which reduces the file size to a manageable number of
Kb's.
In message 4e438085.8050...@dunbar-it.co.uk, Norman Dunbar
nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk writes
Greetings from a very wet and dreich Leeds! (Look it up
URL:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dreich
On 11/08/11 06:12, Computer Research Centrum, Ltd wrote:
No JPEGs please! No lossy
Greetings from a very wet and dreich Leeds! (Look it up
URL:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dreich
On 11/08/11 06:12, Computer Research Centrum, Ltd wrote:
No JPEGs please! No lossy compression!
For computer screenshots the best option is PNG (lossless compression).
I agree 100% -
On 09/08/2011 20:59, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
The point is simple - IF YOU WANT THE WIKI TO BE BETTER /
DIFFERENT / HOSTED SOMEWHERE, THEN CHANGE IT !!
I thought that was the whole point of a Wiki... that site users could
(and should) update it themselves?
If anyone has difficulty accessing some
On 10/08/2011 03:06, David Tubbs wrote:
At 07:33 09/08/2011 +0100, you wrote:
The text is black on white, so it does not affect anything or am I
missing something?
The text is only grey and pink, a decidedly faded look.
As for why your Wiki down beyond adventures - not sure what you
mean
In message 4e423eae.3040...@rwapservices.co.uk, Rich Mellor
r...@rwapservices.co.uk writes
On 09/08/2011 20:59, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
The point is simple - IF YOU WANT THE WIKI TO BE BETTER /
DIFFERENT / HOSTED SOMEWHERE, THEN CHANGE IT !!
I thought that was the whole point of a Wiki... that
It is useful to convert images to 640 x 480 pixels, for web page display
- as JPEG files - which reduces the file size to a manageable number of
Kb's.
No JPEGs please! No lossy compression!
For computer screenshots the best option is PNG (lossless compression).
-- On Tue, 9/8/11, Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk wrote:
From: Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] a VERY expensive QL substitute?
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Date: Tuesday, 9 August, 2011, 7:33
On 09/08/2011 00:38, David Tubbs
wrote:
Mind you, there was some
On 09/08/2011 10:18, peet vanpeebles wrote:
-- On Tue, 9/8/11, Rich Mellorr...@rwapservices.co.uk wrote:
From: Rich Mellorr...@rwapservices.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] a VERY expensive QL substitute?
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Date: Tuesday, 9 August, 2011, 7:33
On 09/08/2011 00:38, David Tubbs
Holy $$ PC man
http://cgi.ebay.com/250725299265
--
Paul Holmgren
Mine: 2 57 300-C's in Indy
Hers: 05 PT GT R/T HO Stage 1
Hoosier Corps L#6
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On 08/08/2011 14:45, paul wrote:
Holy $$ PC man
http://cgi.ebay.com/250725299265
I guess this is designed for used in a PLC (industrial programmable
logic controller) - they were always expensive bits of kit, particularly
once Rockwell Automation started selling them, and yes, they were
Mind you, there was some VERY expensive bits of kit for the QL back in the
hey day - see
http://www.rwapadventures.com/ql_wiki/index.php?title=Quest%20Automation%20Ltd
--
I followed your link.
Why does the page have to look like it has faded in the sun, I know my eyes
are not what they
15 matches
Mail list logo