In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>"how do I unzip QL Info-unzip onto a QL disk to unzip programs with
>if it's already zipped and you need a copy of itself to unzip itself
>catch 22..." (follow JRH's self-extract instructions on his website)
Once a user ha
That's the kind of information that needs to go into this tutorial, I
really hope someone will take up the challenge and write something
because the same questions are being asked over and over again and the
need for information is clearly there.
--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
Fr
On 13 Mar 2006 at 13:17, Claude Mourier 00 wrote:
> Great ! This was a painful feature since original QDOS because it could
> freeze any job without notice
>
> Is there any reason to turn off this feature (slow down for instance) ?
Well, speed issues may arise on slower machines.
Moreover, the
Than's for the reply and for the work (of all contributors)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Marcel Kilgus
Envoyé : lundi 13 mars 2006 13:28
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E v3.12 released
Claude Mourier 00 wrote:
> Is the
Many thanks to whoever was responsible for tweaking Xchange. Can I request a
further tweak?
When working in Archive, the 'Alter' command is closed by pressing the 'F5'
key. as this is adjacent to the 'F6' key it is often the case that both keys
get inadvertently pressed together or perhaps the
Claude Mourier 00 wrote:
> Is there any reason to turn off this feature (slow down for instance)?
No, I don't know any, at least on QPC/Qx0. I just did that to play it
safe. Performance on Aurora is still unknown, though.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing Li
Great ! This was a painful feature since original QDOS because it could freeze
any job without notice
Is there any reason to turn off this feature (slow down for instance) ?
New keyword is a good news too as it allows more interaction between jobs.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:22:00 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
>> That produced a number of similar error messages, after removing 'regp1'
>> from the reported lines it will compile but not run:
>
> Tried issuing "make clean" before "make config" and "