Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread Dilwyn Jones
>> Having just got back and seen the latest QL today, who have I >> upset, >> seeing as Roy and Geoff seem to have taken every opportunity >> possible >> to have a go at me??? >> > > Actually I thought you got off rather lightly. The "Senior > Statesman" was > meant seriously and was a complimen

[ql-users] easyptr

2006-06-06 Thread Dilwyn Jones
With kind thanks to Marcel, I've been using a beta-release of the 68020 QPC2. Extremely stable for a first release! I seem to have run into a minor problem with Easyptr 4 which I cannot pin down enough to trouble Marcel with a definite "bug" report as yet, so I need ot ask for help in tracking dow

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread Dilwyn Jones
>>Having just got back and seen the latest QL today, who have I upset, >>seeing as Roy and Geoff seem to have taken every opportunity >>possible >>to have a go at me??? > > I am afraid it was mostly me - even the captions on the pictures > but, > rest assured, you have not upset me at all. It ju

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread Tony Firshman
gwicks wrote: > The one person who did complain, although he assured me that an apology was > not necessary was Tony. He tells me that he always sings innocently, but > this time it was in a chamber orchestra and not the church choir. ... not a complaint but a correction. A correction * 2 -

[ql-users] Jochen - Private Message

2006-06-06 Thread gwicks
Sorry to use the list to convey this private message. For some reason emails to Jochen are bouncing back, in my case with messages that I am on a database as a spammer. I have replied to your email about Quanta with a copy to Roy. Perhaps Roy could forward this, Best Wishes, Geoff

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" <> To: "QL Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:47 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] get back on topic must... > > Having just got back and seen the latest QL today, who have I upset, > seeing as Roy and Geoff seem to have tak

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread John Taylor
Thanks Roy. The next time we argue will be the first. I was tempted and I fell. John. On 6 Jun 2006, at 19:11, Roy wood wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John > Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> Roy >> >> Every now and again this board indulges in bouts of mental >> gymnastics. >

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread Roy wood
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Roy > >Every now and again this board indulges in bouts of mental gymnastics. >You have taken part in the past, but not this time. >Why then are you complaining. To be honest it was not really a complaint more of a joke on the

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread John Taylor
No "?". Sorry! John T. On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:52, John Taylor wrote: > Roy > > Every now and again this board indulges in bouts of mental gymnastics. > You have taken part in the past, but not this time. > Why then are you complaining. > > John T. > > > > > On 5 Jun 2006, at 23:34, Roy wood wro

Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread John Taylor
Roy Every now and again this board indulges in bouts of mental gymnastics. You have taken part in the past, but not this time. Why then are you complaining. John T. On 5 Jun 2006, at 23:34, Roy wood wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn > Jones > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >>