[Ql-Users] test

2009-01-24 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Test email only, please ignore.
Dilwyn
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] test

2009-01-24 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening Dilwyn,

 Test email only, please ignore.

I tried to ignore it, but it said that I *had to* ignore it, so if I had
ignored it, then I would have followed the instructions in the email and
that would have meant that I had not, in fact, ignored it!

My brain hurts after that!

Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] test

2009-01-24 Thread Dilwyn Jones

Evening Dilwyn,


Test email only, please ignore.


I tried to ignore it, but it said that I *had to* ignore it, so if I had
ignored it, then I would have followed the instructions in the email and
that would have meant that I had not, in fact, ignored it!

My brain hurts after that!

Cheers,
Norman.

E.

So was this as a result of dreaming up an in-depth assembler article on 
condition-testing and decision-making, perchance?


On the other hand, if you had ignored it, you would have failed to ignore 
what it said and an exception condition would have been generated which you 
could not have ignored and your condition-testing routine would have gone 
into an infinite loop which you could ignore because it would seem as though 
it was ignoring you.


Hang on, the men in white coats are here to take me away...

--
Dilwyn Jones 



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] test

2009-01-24 Thread Tony Firshman

gdgqler wrote:


On 24 Jan 2009, at 17:14, Dilwyn Jones wrote:


Evening Dilwyn,


Test email only, please ignore.


I tried to ignore it, but it said that I *had to* ignore it, so if I 
had
ignored it, then I would have followed the instructions in the email 
and

that would have meant that I had not, in fact, ignored it!

My brain hurts after that!

Cheers,
Norman.

E.

So was this as a result of dreaming up an in-depth assembler article 
on condition-testing and decision-making, perchance?


On the other hand, if you had ignored it, you would have failed to 
ignore what it said and an exception condition would have been 
generated which you could not have ignored and your condition-testing 
routine would have gone into an infinite loop which you could ignore 
because it would seem as though it was ignoring you.


Hang on, the men in white coats are here to take me away...



My comment is intentionally blank.

George

PS

Except for *GEORGE* 
There is a notice on  posh piano where I rehearse saying that Nothing 
must be placed on this piano - I have added (except this notice). 

The other one I like is the notice on the *only* way in to a local 
primary school where 90% of the children arrive.  This gate must be 
closed at all times.  I have yet to see kids thrown over the gate (8-)#


You are all *very* polite. In comp.sys.sinclair (or something like that) 
they are not so gentlemanly!


Tony

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] test

2009-01-24 Thread Andy Barber
Seen in Brixton, South London, by the 2, 3  332 bus stop. (There is only one 
stop there that does these three routes.)

Fire Door. Must be locked at all times.




From: Tony Firshman t...@firshman.co.uk
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Saturday, 24 January, 2009 18:08:52
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] test

gdgqler wrote:
 
 On 24 Jan 2009, at 17:14, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
 
 Evening Dilwyn,
 
 Test email only, please ignore.
 
 I tried to ignore it, but it said that I *had to* ignore it, so if I had
 ignored it, then I would have followed the instructions in the email and
 that would have meant that I had not, in fact, ignored it!
 
 My brain hurts after that!
 
 Cheers,
 Norman.
 E.
 
 So was this as a result of dreaming up an in-depth assembler article on 
 condition-testing and decision-making, perchance?
 
 On the other hand, if you had ignored it, you would have failed to ignore 
 what it said and an exception condition would have been generated which you 
 could not have ignored and your condition-testing routine would have gone 
 into an infinite loop which you could ignore because it would seem as though 
 it was ignoring you.
 
 Hang on, the men in white coats are here to take me away...
 
 
 My comment is intentionally blank.
 
 George
 
 PS
 
 Except for *GEORGE* 
There is a notice on  posh piano where I rehearse saying that Nothing must be 
placed on this piano - I have added (except this notice). 
The other one I like is the notice on the *only* way in to a local primary 
school where 90% of the children arrive.  This gate must be closed at all 
times.  I have yet to see kids thrown over the gate (8-)#

You are all *very* polite. In comp.sys.sinclair (or something like that) they 
are not so gentlemanly!

Tony

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm



  
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm