### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Thanks :) On 16/12/2017 19:36, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: The least significant of the 6 green bits. Am 16.12.2017 um 19:12 schrieb pjwitte via Ql-Users: Sorry for yanking your chain again so soon but, on going the other way, ie from mode 32 to 33, what is the best value for W? g6, 0, 1..?

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

The least significant of the 6 green bits. Am 16.12.2017 um 19:12 schrieb pjwitte via Ql-Users: > Sorry for yanking your chain again so soon but, on going the other > way, ie from mode 32 to 33, what is the best value for W? g6, 0, 1..? > > Per > > On 16/12/2017 18:13, pjwitte via Ql-Users

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Sorry for yanking your chain again so soon but, on going the other way, ie from mode 32 to 33, what is the best value for W? g6, 0, 1..? Per On 16/12/2017 18:13, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: Aah! Perfect! Thanks Marcel, youre a star! So in fact I interpreted the input wrong. It should have

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Aah! Perfect! Thanks Marcel, youre a star! So in fact I interpreted the input wrong. It should have been: GGGggRRR rrBBBbbW <- input and ggWBBBbb RRRrrGGG -> output Seems so obvious now ;) Per On 16/12/2017 15:30, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: 320 c\$ = c\$(4 to 5) & c\$(16) & c\$(11 to

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: > With > > 290  REMark GGGBBBbb RRRrrgg0 > 300  c\$ = c\$(3 TO 5) & c\$(11 TO 15) & c\$(6 TO 10) & c\$(1 TO 2) & '0' > > I got the best results. While, with 300 REMarked out and 320 un-REMarked: > > 310  ggWBBBbb RRRrrGGG -> RRRrrGGG ggWBBBbb in big-endian > 320  c\$ = c\$(1

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Thanks both for your input! However, Wolfgang, Im having trouble with your suggestion. Perhaps Ive interpreted wrongly? Heres how I got on: 100 REMark Convert screens mode 33 to 32 110 REMark POC, pjw, December 16th 2017 120 : 140 fnm\$ = 'ram2_dmp1024x768_scr' 150 : 160 t = DATE 170 ERT

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: > I havent tested your suggestion yet, Wolfgang, but what I found so far > was that gggbrgg0 appears (to my eye) to look cleaner than > gggbrggW. Is that so wrong? ;) It is right, because gggbrggW has the W at the wrong bit. It must be the

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Oops! That should be: GGGBBBbb RRRrrgg0 = mode 32 translated P On 16/12/2017 11:43, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: I havent tested your suggestion yet, Wolfgang, but what I found so far was that gggbrgg0 appears (to my eye) to look cleaner than gggbrggW. Is that so wrong? ;) BTW,

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Hi Per, The PC switches the bytes around. So gggb rgg0 actually means rgg0 gggb In other words, you're switching the third highest byte for green on or off. If you sure that's what you want, then that's fine. Wolfgang On 16/12/2017 11:43, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: I

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

But the same as my proposal :) Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > No, not the same as %gggbrggW, as suggested in the original post. > > Wolfgang > > On 16/12/2017 10:18, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: >> Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: >>> I'd do it this way >>> >>> %ggWbrggg >> >>

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

No, not the same as %gggbrggW, as suggested in the original post. Wolfgang On 16/12/2017 10:18, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: I'd do it this way %ggWbrggg Which is the same :) ___ QL-Users

### Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: > I'd do it this way > > %ggWbrggg Which is the same :) ___ QL-Users Mailing List