Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

2009-03-01 Thread Billy
John Gilpin wrote: Hi Everyone, Firstly, thank you to those readers of QUANTA Magazine who have said how much they have enjoyed the latest issues. I agree - best for a long time My envelope was tattered and torn along the bottom - just to be different! I have recently cancelled my

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

2009-03-01 Thread Go Boy Go(lt)
Hi John (Gilpin) Thanks for your work with QUANTA Re your: Please keep me informed of this problem over the next few issues - whether yours is damaged OR NOT (to get some idea of balance) - it may be worth asking the PO to investigate. My

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

2009-03-01 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Secondly, I am concerned about the damaged envelopes which some of you are getting. In order to minimise costs, I buy these envelopes in bulk, and it takes about 7 issues to use the quantity. It may be that the self sealing adhesive dries out during this period as I have noticed that occasionally

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

2009-03-01 Thread Malcolm Cadman
-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1 Hi Malcolm, I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1, for February / March 2009. I received it as well. Yes, well done - and I prefer to see the ads in full page mode again - excellent decision. And up-to-date

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

2009-02-28 Thread Jochen Merz
Hi Malcolm, I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1, for February / March 2009. I received it as well. Yes, well done - and I prefer to see the ads in full page mode again - excellent decision. And up-to-date :-) One other point. Is anyone else