RE: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writing QDOS for x86 processors

2001-10-11 Thread Claude Mourier 00
Ah ! I think it was just a french problem where magazines looks more an more catalogues with lot of advertising and propaganda (guru Bill do this, guru Bill thinks that...) -Message d'origine- De : Malcolm Cadman (...) OT - yet computer magazines today are largely just product reviews,

Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writing QDOS for x86 processors

2001-10-11 Thread Peter S Tillier
Marcel Kilgus wrote: Claude Mourier 00 wrote: I wonder what is QPC overhead (it's not to offense Marcel : QPC is a great product) : does anybody know the slowdown factor eaten by the emulator, or in other word, what is the factor to apply to the speed of SMSQ under QPC to have an idea

Re: [ql-users] Hyper Browse Development - ProWesS use

2001-10-11 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Though ProWesS is GPL, this is no problem when distributing you program. Everybody can download the ProWesS and install it. I have already explicitly mentioned this on release of the free version of ProWesS. You should compare this with a program storing the data in a database. If the program is

Re: [ql-users] Hyper Browse Development - freetype

2001-10-11 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
There is another possibility and that is to use Freetype... (the source of which is downloadable and I had some success when I toyed with it although my C knowledge is hm limited). ( www.freetype.org IIRC). The latter has three major advantages: If you try to compare this to ProWesS

Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writing QDOS for x86 processors

2001-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 10 Oct 2001, at 22:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Anyway x86 assembler is something nobody wants to program really, especially when coming from the 68k corner, believe me. It sure isn't! Segments - B Wolfgang - www.wlenerz.com

Re: [ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writing QDOS for x86 processors

2001-10-11 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Anyway x86 assembler is something nobody wants to program really, especially when coming from the 68k corner, believe me. It sure isn't! Segments - B Actually segments aren't used anymore (thank God). However, the instruction set is still quite horrible. And

[ql-users] OT - Community web site

2001-10-11 Thread Malcolm Cadman
Hi all, Apologises for OT subject. Take a look at a new web site :- www.pepyscommunityforum.org This is a community based organisation that I am involved with ... you will even find my 'mug shot' in there somewhere :-) We have designed the web site ourselves, as volunteers. -- Malcolm

[ql-users] Need some flaming :-) - What about re-writing QDOS for x86 processors

2001-10-11 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Claude Mourier 00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Ah ! I think it was just a french problem where magazines looks more an more catalogues with lot of advertising and propaganda (guru Bill do this, guru Bill thinks that...) -Message d'origine- De : Malcolm Cadman

Re: [ql-users] OT - Community web site

2001-10-11 Thread Timothy Swenson
Mug shot is right. I actually pictured you to be a little bit younger (well, OK, a lot younger :-) ). Tim Swenson

Re: [ql-users] OT - Community web site

2001-10-11 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 at 22:06:48, Malcolm Cadman wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hi all, Apologises for OT subject. Take a look at a new web site :- www.pepyscommunityforum.org This is a community based organisation that I am involved with ... you will even find my 'mug shot' in there

Re: [ql-users] OT - Community web site

2001-10-11 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 10:50 ìì 11/10/2001 +0100, you wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 at 22:06:48, Malcolm Cadman wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hi all, Apologises for OT subject. Take a look at a new web site :- www.pepyscommunityforum.org This is a community based organisation that I am involved with ...