Dave wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Stephen Meech wrote:
Thank you I lurk because I am no longer an active QL-user and therefore
rarely have anything to contribute My QLs have not been powered up for many
years but I retain a nostalgic interest, continue my Quanta sub and very
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, ZN wrote:
I think these correct the 8301 ULA timing to US specs (60Hz), but I can't
be sure, I've only had a glance at a US QL
If the US QLs have an interrupt to write out the video memory 60 times a
second, doesn't that mean they must run a good deal slower than their
Dave wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, ZN wrote:
I think these correct the 8301 ULA timing to US specs (60Hz), but I can't
be sure, I've only had a glance at a US QL
If the US QLs have an interrupt to write out the video memory 60 times a
second, doesn't that mean they must run a good deal
: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] SuperQ Board
I worked all this out and published it between 1990 and 1992 after
Tony Firshman volunteered me as a possible repairer for an issue 2
superQboard which
had been struck by lightning!
Hello Steven,
I wonder how many
I think I still have that board! It was never quite the same, despite your
hours of work.
Nice to hear from you again.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Keith Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users
Anybody knows what kind of mouse a Sandy Super Q-Board takes?
(Also do you know if it works with ICE?)
Phoebus
There were two types of mouse interface...
One was a 9 pin serial mouse, and the other was a DIN socket that also
used a serial mouse, but I don't have the pinout. I recall most were the 9
pin connectors.
I don't recommend using one in an In Car Entertainment Ssstem ;)
Dave
On Wed, 27 Feb
At 07:50 ìì 27/2/2002 +, you wrote:
There were two types of mouse interface...
One was a 9 pin serial mouse, and the other was a DIN socket that also
used a serial mouse, but I don't have the pinout. I recall most were the 9
pin connectors.
That has the 9 pin... so it takes a standard PC
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
That has the 9 pin... so it takes a standard PC one or is it a little
different?
They were standard PC serial mice.
Hehe aren't we the joker here ;-)
It's not only you that were a fan of ICE!
Anyway I just bought a Sandy SuperQ-Board plus 4 US
On 2/27/02 at 7:50 PM Dave wrote:
There were two types of mouse interface...
One was a 9 pin serial mouse, and the other was a DIN socket that also
used a serial mouse, but I don't have the pinout. I recall most were
the 9 pin connectors.
Are you sure? What was used to receive the serial
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:18:27PM -0500, ZN wrote:
On 2/27/02 at 7:50 PM Dave wrote:
There were two types of mouse interface...
One was a 9 pin serial mouse, and the other was a DIN socket that also
used a serial mouse, but I don't have the pinout. I recall most were
the 9 pin
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 at 20:02:45, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
That has the 9 pin... so it takes a standard PC one or is it a little
different?
They were standard PC serial mice.
Hehe aren't we the joker here ;-)
It's not only you that
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 at 15:18:27, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 2/27/02 at 7:50 PM Dave wrote:
There were two types of mouse interface...
One was a 9 pin serial mouse, and the other was a DIN socket that also
used a serial mouse, but I don't have the pinout. I recall most were
the 9
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Quite a lot of noise suppression components etc to meet FCC
requirements.
I don't know of anything else.
Hmmm. So if that zinc paint was around back then, they could have just
painted the inside of the case with it ;)
The inside of the ARM-QL case
27/02/02 12:24:09, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, ZN wrote:
Are you sure? What was used to receive the serial protocol?
I'm asking because I have seen the SQB schematic (long time ago) but don't
remember anything like this. Are you sure they were not of the 'bus mouse'
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 at 23:41:37, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Quite a lot of noise suppression components etc to meet FCC
requirements.
I don't know of anything else.
Hmmm. So if that zinc paint was around back then, they could have just
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 at 23:49:12, you wrote:
(ref: TR5MHVRLZX94YKGCA5Y5YTQYTFDC.3c7de0f8@akm-desktop)
27/02/02 12:24:09, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, ZN wrote:
Are you sure? What was used to receive the serial protocol?
I'm asking because I have seen the SQB schematic
17 matches
Mail list logo
