??? 18/9/2002 4:51:49 ??, ?/? Dave P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
>
>
>
>On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
>> In essence you are including the second ">" within the url whereas you
>> should leave it out. Turnpike (and any receiving mailer) correctly
>> interprets the %3E as part of the
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 at 15:27:33, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>>Certainly Turnpike, which slavishly follows internet conventions, and
>>very successfully I think, accepts these forms, and correctly linked the
>>quoted URL above.
>
>All of my mailers cannot handle the form of
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> In essence you are including the second ">" within the url whereas you
> should leave it out. Turnpike (and any receiving mailer) correctly
> interprets the %3E as part of the url and feeds it to the browser...
> however there's no address that corre
Wolfgang Lenerz writes:
> > >Please let me have your ideas.
> >
> > 1) Some solution that addresses the filename length & seperators issue!
> > (Build on current or devise new, with backward compatibility)
>
> Umph, going right for the jugular, aren't we?
;) Dont pretend you dont want this, too
At 12:54 ìì 18/9/2002, you wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 at 11:50:30, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> >
> >At 01:47 ìì 16/9/2002, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>- Original Message -
> >>From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Sent: Saturday,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 at 11:50:30, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>At 01:47 ìì 16/9/2002, you wrote:
>
>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 5:47 PM
>>Subject: Re: [ql-users]
At 01:47 ìì 16/9/2002, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 5:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta - Articles plea
>
>
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce N
> > <[EMAIL PROTEC
