Ôçí 3/11/2002 1:45:25 ðì, ï/ç "Geoff Wicks"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ýãñáøå:
>Does anyone have Santa's email address?
>
>Geoff Wicks
Sure we do :-)
He actually uses two...
here they are:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
Ôçí 3/11/2002 1:45:25 ðì, ï/ç "Geoff Wicks"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ýãñáøå:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Subject: Re: [ql-users] Q-Word
>
>
>> > > >Q-Word? I must have missed something here. What is
it?
>> > >>
>> > > It's a Word puzzle game :-) You get a screen with
mixed up lett
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Q-Word
> > >Q-Word? I must have missed something here. What is it?
> >>
> > It's a Word puzzle game :-) You get a screen with mixed up letters and
> you
> find words in it... when you do so the tiles
> > dissappear and a picture appear
In a message dated 02/11/02 15:13:04 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Gwilt is the expert on how to get at the source of compiled programs.
However it may not be possible unless the program has been compiled with
flags in the same way as C programs can be compiled with a swit
John Sadler wrote:
> It is possible to create an assembler which will take 680?0 code and create
> Intel machine code output.
How? There's much more to it than a simple "move.l is called mov on
Intel".
> I think Marcel and allied programmers have the knowledge to create a virtual
> machine which
??? 1/11/2002 5:48:42 ??, ?/? "John Sadler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
>
>Perhaps the answer is to build a QL with PC hardware.
>
>It is possible to create an assembler which will take 680?0 code and create
>Intel machine code output.
>
>I think Marcel and allied programmers have the knowledge t
Perhaps the answer is to build a QL with PC hardware.
It is possible to create an assembler which will take 680?0 code and create
Intel machine code output.
I think Marcel and allied programmers have the knowledge to create a virtual
machine which can use the Windows drivers.
Then you have the
George Gwilt is the expert on how to get at the source of compiled programs.
However it may not be possible unless the program has been compiled with
flags in the same way as C programs can be compiled with a switch so that a
debugger can access the lines and enable one to step through it.
I kno
P Witte wrote:
> Wlenerz had just told me that there were only *two* confirmed SMSQ/E
> "developers" (modestly forgetting himself), namely you and (wait for it) -
> me! (And I signed up mainly to help with the coffies and put the jelly beans
> on the pizzas ;)
Then I'll have one pepperoni pizza p
Was Re: [ql-users] Hardware platforms
Marcel Kilgus writes,
> > Any problem with QPC2? It is a quantum leap ahead of the competition in
that
> > it runs SMSQ/E. It is currently supported by probably the only ace
> > programmer active on the QL scene (sorry Marcel ;)
>
> Don't make me blush ;)
>
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Marcel, just a thought, would it be possible to include an SBASIC
> command (+ m/code equivalent) in a future QPC version to disable QPC
> audio from SBASIC (assuming I ain't missed an existing one!) ?
Sounds ok, I've put it on the wish list.
> Do you hope to add the sound
11 matches
Mail list logo
