Re: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread P Witte
Rich Mellor writes: > > I think the trick is to set a breakpoint in the actual code to debug. I seem > > to remember you can debug code which runs under iow.xtop, just not through > > the call itself. > > > > I think that I have tried that before.. but thanks for the tip - I will give > it a try

Re: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Norman Dunbar wrote: > I'm replying to myself - how sad :o) A colleague was having a bad morning today. We knew he was having a bad morning, he'd gone beyond talking to himself, he was answering his own questions then when someone commented he claimed "that was the most intelligent conversation I'

[ql-users] Q-Trans v0.08

2003-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
For Jon Dent and one or two others who gave feedback on the previous versions, v0.08 of Q-Trans is now on my website. 1. Bug in passing hit filenames to stuffer buffer (loss of directory name) fixed. 2. Better handling of network names in F2 and F3 windows (someone please check this as I only ha

Re: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 16/01/03 12:35:06 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the trick is to set a breakpoint in the actual code to debug. I seem to remember you can debug code which runs under iow.xtop, just not through the call itself. I think that I have tried that before.. but

Re: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
> One of the most > bothersome problems has to be the fact that attempting to trace throw an > IOW.XTOP call actually crashes the machine (even with LS set). This is > particularly annoying in view of the need to write new graphics commands!! I think the trick is to set a breakpoint in the actua

RE: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Rich, when I said it was 'sad' I wasn't implying that no-one could be bothered to reply - I've had a couple of private replies - just that I a 'saddo' who replies to his own emails, if you know what I'm rambling on about :o) I haven't used the channels thing much myself, but I need to because

Re: [ql-users] QTrans v0.07

2003-01-16 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article <001701c2bcd5$f74a68e0$4b4301d5@famwaugh>, Bill Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >- Original Message - >From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:04 PM >Subject: Re: [ql-users] QTrans v0.07 > >> >> In article <000801c

Re: [ql-users] Size of the current QL market

2003-01-16 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes >Does anyone have any indication of the current QL market?? > >I guess we can only base this on the readership of QL Today and the Quanta >membership, although possibly Tony may have a better idea. > >Any guesses are invited (wild or not).

Re: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 16/01/03 09:23:13 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm replying to myself - how sad :o) My apologies - I've been having a few PC problems (yet again) Seems like when you RTFM things become a bit less murky. QMON/JMON can indeed only work with 4 channels and only

RE: [ql-users] QMON2

2003-01-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
I'm replying to myself - how sad :o) Seems like when you RTFM things become a bit less murky. QMON/JMON can indeed only work with 4 channels and only 0 to 3 are allowed wherever a channel name is specified. So 'bug 2' is not a bug, it is a user error. Cheers, Norman. ---