Re: [ql-users] RFC

2003-10-01 Thread Marcel Kilgus
P Witte wrote: > In some older programs I use a different scheme, with F10 stuffing the > edited string into the stuffer buffer. Oh well, so you're already doing exactly the same. > Those, and any other existing programs that do something similar, > will find that they get two copies of the keyb

Re: [ql-users] RFC

2003-10-01 Thread P Witte
Marcel Kilgus writes: > > I already use this keystroke in a number of my programs for the purpose (F5 > > in Qwirc, FF and others, and F10 in older programs) so in my case Id want to > > override, disable or avoid this facility in individual programs. > > Why? It wouldn't change the behaviour of

Re: [ql-users] RFC

2003-10-01 Thread wlenerz
On 1 Oct 2003 at 0:03, P Witte wrote: . > > I already use this keystroke in a number of my programs for the purpose (F5 > in Qwirc, FF and others, and F10 in older programs) so in my case Id want to > override, disable or avoid this facility in individual programs. Err, no, you wouldn't - this k

[ql-developers] OT: Email Problems

2003-10-01 Thread "Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)"
Hi all, if someone was trying to contact me via email these past few days, please note that my email accounts were down. You may have been able to receive email from me (since I am using a different smtp server for some of my accounts) but I did not receive anything from late Friday - ealry Satu