P Witte wrote: > In some older programs I use a different scheme, with F10 stuffing the > edited string into the stuffer buffer.
Oh well, so you're already doing exactly the same. > Those, and any other existing programs that do something similar, > will find that they get two copies of the keyboard queue contents. > The first copy would hold what iob.edlin thinks is the resultant > string (accessed by Alt+Shift+Space or equivalent) while the second > would hold what your program knows to be the correct version. > Disconcerting, messy and quite unnecessary, methinks. This I don't really understand. Either you use iob.edlin, in this case F10 was useless in the past and now could be filled with some life. Or you don't use iob.edlin, then the change doesn't really concern you. Marcel
