RE: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-13 Thread Claude Mourier 00
This was not an attack of Turbo, just my experience. With older versions you need to carefully look to all parameters passed to PROCs because behavior is not the same as SBasic. And I think Linker+ QD+Sbasic thing+Qlib is still a very good developpment tool thanks to good work of Wolgang and

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 13/02/2004 05:03:49 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: True. In any case I was talking about QDOS (Classic) and Minerva. Unbelievable as it may seem, there are users that still require full compatibility with QDOS and SMSQ/e is not an option for them. I

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:40:02 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 Feb 2004 at 0:03, Phoebus R. Dokos ( . wrote: snip Flashback was quite a progmming feat, (very fast), but severely limited in other ways IIRC. I think it interfered with the ALT/Hotkey system. I wonder, if it is

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:40:01 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13 Feb 2004 at 4:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote: But then again, I could also win the lottery on Saturday. Well I hope you don't - you'd probably off to laze in the sun in Barbados, and the QL world still needs you... grin

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Tony Firshman
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 at 09:17:14, =?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?= wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:40:01 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] lenerz.com wrote: On 13 Feb 2004 at 4:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote: But then again, I

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Well I hope you don't - you'd probably off to laze in the sun in Barbados, and the QL world still needs you... grin Ah well, my current plans are to laze in the sun in Miami in April. Because of the QL :-) (what you mean you actualyl play the lottery?) Nah, I

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Dave P
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tony Firshman wrote: ... then you do not think carefully about the maths. In the UK, anyone who buys a lotto ticket on Wednesday is more likely to die that win the Saturday jackpot - a sobering thought (8-)# Not to mention that the pool of cash being redistributed

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Phoebus R. Dokos (F??ß?? ?. ?t) wrote: True. In any case I was talking about QDOS (Classic) and Minerva. Well, good luck then. Especially with Minerva, considering that there are only a few bytes free space left in the ROM. Unbelievable as it may seem, there are users that still require

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 13 Feb 2004 at 10:57, Dave P wrote: Similarly, for our US QL users, think about this: a. The number of physicians in the US is 700,000. (...) Then think about this: a. The number of gun owners in the US is 80,000,000. (..) Statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 13 Feb 2004 at 9:15, Phoebus R. Dokos (‚ . „Œ wrote: Most likely, but where the user is concerned they really don't care as long as it works correct? :-D Yes - just as long as I do not think that it doesn't work. On the contrary. Sorry, wans't that what you were saying -

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 13 Feb 2004 at 9:17, Phoebus R. Dokos ( . ) wrote: Why not? I do :-) (Especially with Powerball loterry jackpots running usually at US$ 50.000.000 (or more!) I'd rather spend my money on something else. Wolfgang

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Waugh
- Original Message - From: Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:57 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tony Firshman wrote: snip a. The number of physicians in the US is 700,000. b. Accidental deaths caused by

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Dave P
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Lies, damn lies etc. How many HEALTHY persons die of physician's error gun accidents? Well, actually those stats aren't lies. They were produced by the Houston Health Science Center of the University of Texas. In fact, the stats were the best

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread Timothy Swenson
Yea, yea, Yea. American have guns, Europeans don't. No need to start a long thread about the merits of either. I can always start the thread that our royality are not on the taxpayers' dollar. :-) I read the bit about Quanta and shows with some disinterest. Given that I have to fly 2,000

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread P Witte
Dave P writes: a. The number of gun owners in the US is 80,000,000. b. The number of accidental gun deaths per year (all age groups) is 1,500. c. The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is 0.000188. Its the deliberate ones that are the worry. Per

Re: [ql-users] Quanta

2004-02-13 Thread P Witte
Phoebus R. Dokos writes: and a couple of others running custom QDOS-based software, that unfortunately cannot work with SMSQ/e either. custom often meant pretty dirty; didn't it? Most likely, but where the user is concerned they really don't care as long as it works correct? :-D I