- Original Message -
From: Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)
I approached Fred Toussi a while ago about doing an
upgrade to Text 87 and suggested that he could produce
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 at 22:45:55, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Qliberator was another story but Ian Stewart, who was my only contact,
had only a small part in writing it. The other author, whose name
escapes me,
Adrian Soundy
had long since disappeared and the sources were not
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)
Does this fall into the parameters of what you were looking for
Geoff - the possibility of paying someone to extend the SDUMP system.
Of course, a small(ish
Does this fall into the parameters of what you were looking for
Geoff - the possibility of paying someone to extend the SDUMP
system.
Of course, a small(ish) job, but one that could be incoporated into
a lot of
programs. Perhaps we should start thinking of what sort of routines
we would
This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to
spend
on QL development. How should they spend this money?
In fact Quanta would have two possible ways of financially
stimulating QL
development. Major projects (SGC successor?) could be financed out
of the
capital. These
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Taffel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have said that Quanta is heading towards a £1000 a year structural
profit. I am also interested in how much Quanta has in realisable assets.
The reason I ask, is that as has been pointed out, the pond is now a
puddle
I haven't answered on this thread until now mainly because (in the first
attempt...) I wasn't sure whether that kind of money would conceivably around
in this matter.
Now that Geoff has given more details, here's my 2 cents' worth.
I don't know whether offering something like 1000 pounds for
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)
SNIP
I don't know whether offering something like 1000 pounds for software
would
be a good idea.
The reason is that it is, in my mind, too much and too little
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:22:18 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't answered on this thread until now mainly because (in the first
attempt...) I wasn't sure whether that kind of money would conceivably
around
in this matter.
Now that Geoff has given more details, here's my 2
: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 7:52 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)
SNIP
I don't
Geoff Wicks wrote:
This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to
spend on QL development. How should they spend this money?
On march, 8th, Laurence Reeves answered::
1000 pounds to the person who ports OpenOffice? ;)
That seems like a lot of cash for what is a pretty
gwicks wrote:
snip
This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to spend
on QL development. How should they spend this money?
snip
Remember your subscription is your money, not Quanta's. How would you like
them to spend it on your behalf?
Geoff Wicks.
Hi
Take a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
I was thinking on the subject of what next for the QL. I think we really need
something that acts like a web browser. This means the display of text and graphics
in the same viewer. There was an attempt a few years back at writing a web
browser for the QL (from
Geoff Wicks writes:
Remember your subscription is your money, not Quanta's. How would you like
them to spend it on your behalf?
In a way, hardware development is more deserving as hw developers have real
outlays apart from spare time, ie their profit can go negative rather than
just zero. But
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote:
Geoff Wicks wrote:
This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to
spend on QL development. How should they spend this money?
On march, 8th, Laurence Reeves answered::
1000 pounds to the person who ports OpenOffice? ;)
That seems like a lot of cash
Thanks to all the people who have replied to this thread. Nice to know I can
still stir things up! Just a pity that the subject was hijacked into a
discussion on printers although there were one or two other good
suggestions.
Thus a 2nd attempt to get answers.
Let me be more specific why I
I was thinking on the subject of what next for the QL. I think we really need
something that acts like a web browser. This means the display of text and graphics
in the same viewer. There was an attempt a few years back at writing a web
browser for the QL (from Italy I think), but it really
17 matches
Mail list logo
