RE: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-13 Thread Claude Mourier 00
and Jochen. But I understand Turbo is up todate and is intended to be new standard for compiled Sbasic Claude -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoye : jeudi 12 fevrier 2004 22:04 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [ql-users

Re: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-12 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:36:44 +0100, Claude Mourier 00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because it is far more easy to use then Turbo : you have can compile your code directly when you need to adapt it with Turbo (at least versions I know) That is not true. You do not need to adapt any code apart from

RE: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-11 Thread Claude Mourier 00
Because it is far more easy to use then Turbo : you have can compile your code directly when you need to adapt it with Turbo (at least versions I know) And Qlib is the only one implemented as Thing in QD (you can parse and compile without line number) and used by tool like the Linker. (and I

Re: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-11 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 10 Feb 2004 at 20:31, Timothy Swenson wrote: With all honesty, I find Qlib to be an easier compiler to use. Now, both have their problem compared to a real compiler like C68. Both require you to LOAD the program into SBASIC. This is, actually, not quite true. QLIB requires the program

Re: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-11 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 11/02/2004 10:28:32 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for your info.I am now only waiting for Price etc before getting back to the member whomade the query.I will pass on your very valid comments regarding Turbo/QLib but just at themoment I am

Re: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-11 Thread Malcolm Lear
Excellent work George!! Its just the incentive I need to really get into TurboPTR. Malcolm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 11/02/04 01:16:30 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (But why would anyone want to get Q-Liberator when Turbo is free, twice as fast, plus now it

Re: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-11 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], thegilpins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Hi, I'm being asked about the latest on QLiberator (latest version, where it's available from, how much, what does it (not) work with, etc.) Can anybody help me please? John Gilpin. It has not been updated for a long time. I have

Re: [ql-users] QLiberator

2004-02-10 Thread Timothy Swenson
At 08:14 PM 2/10/2004 -0500, you wrote: (But why would anyone want to get Q-Liberator when Turbo is free, twice as fast, plus now it can incorporate extensions in the executable. We should know as Q-Word is done this way thanks to George Gwilt). Turbo IMHO was always a superior product and with