[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: £ 0.00 to spend! (1st attempt)

2004-03-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Just wondering if making a new Q60 SMSQ/E would be a matter of bolting on Q60 specific modules to standard SMSQ/E releases? There already are Q60 specific modules. That's what I meant. Not having a Q60 here I didn't know if SMSQ/E for Q60 was same SMSQ/E version as QXL, QPC, Gold Card etc

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: £ 0.00 to spend! (1st attempt)

2004-03-17 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I would also be willing to chip in some $$ also and it could possibly work in one of 2 ways. Either buy the rights to put SMSQ/E under the GPL or pay Peter to release his work under GPL for QDOS Classic or Minerva. This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not want any money

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: £ 0.00 to spend! (1st attempt)

2004-03-17 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes SNIP Alternatively, instead of forcing money he doesn't want onto Peter Graf, an alternative approach might be to buy into Q60 SMSQ/E maintenance, i.e. whoever is building and releasing the new SMSQ/E gets paid to produce a Q60

Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: £ 0.00 to spend! (1st attempt)

2004-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 17 Mar 2004 at 18:28, Dilwyn Jones wrote: How much of SMSQ/E for Qx0 is modular and how much inbuilt (i.e. has to be rewritten every time a new SMSQ/E is released)? Nothing has to be rewrittenfor the Q60 (or any other machine) every time a new SMSQ/E is released, unless some changes are