On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:36:39 +0200, ZN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4.5.2004 at 19:32 Phoebus R. Dokos ( .
) wrote:
That's what I remembered, although it makes really no difference now as
I
think I solved my Aurora/SGC problem :-) It is good to know however.
Phoebus
You posted this before I had a
On Wed, 5 May 2004 at 00:18:33, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Derek Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think you will find that the QXL requires all the sockets to be filled.
The chips are arranged in 2 banks.
No you can have only have the sockets filled
PROTECTED]
Sent by:cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] QXL 2
I think you will find that the QXL requires all the sockets to be filled.
The chips are arranged in 2 banks.
Derek
- Original Message -
From: Phoebus R. Dokos ( . ) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: [ql-users] QXL 2 question
Hi
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Derek Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think you will find that the QXL requires all the sockets to be filled.
The chips are arranged in 2 banks.
No you can have only have the sockets filled but you have to use
alternate sockets.
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks
On Wed, 5 May 2004 00:18:33 +0100, Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Derek Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think you will find that the QXL requires all the sockets to be
filled.
The chips are arranged in 2 banks.
No you can have only have the sockets filled
