Dilwyn, with all the stuff that you are providing on your www site maybe
you should also consider an FTP repository. In that way all the files
available are readily accessible for download.
FTP came before HTTP and was designed for file access. Although the
latter seems now to be more
Actually I personally prefer the way you have it now Dilwyn. It works
great and you are able to give descriptions with everything. An FTP
site is fine for massive file downloads or looking for particulars.
But it depends on file names and folder hierarchy to let people know
what stuff is.
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Dilwyn, with all the stuff that you are providing on your www site maybe
you should also consider an FTP repository. In that way all the files
available are readily accessible for download.
FTP came before HTTP and was designed for file
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:18:49 +, Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Dilwyn, with all the stuff that you are providing on your www site
maybe
you should also consider an FTP repository. In that way all the files
available are
I don't think that I see the changes. Am I blind or did they not
actually get uploaded yet?
Thanks,
jim
Just checked (1345 UK time), they are there. The email was sent immediately
after I uploaded the files, updated pages don't seem to become public for a
little while (usually a few
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I don't think that I see the changes. Am I blind or did they not
actually get uploaded yet?
Thanks,
jim
Just checked (1345 UK time), they are there. The email was sent
immediately after I uploaded the files, updated pages don't seem to
Hi Dilwyn,
I don't think that I see the changes. Am I blind or did they not
actually get uploaded yet?
Thanks,
jim
On Jan 11, 2005, at 4:08 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I've updated the Graphics page on my software download site to include
the BMP and QL high colour screen conversion and other
