Re: [ql-users] was Turbo, now A4 A5

2005-08-13 Thread gwicks


- Original Message - 
From: David Tubbs

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Turbo

Thanks for the apology!


A4 A5

There is a troglodyte, living far out in the desert, running a solar 
powered  MDV only 128 QL. He does NOT have access to the Internet.


Is there anyone else that does not have a phone line and a PC, or access 
to the web from the office, a library or an Internet caff ?  If these 
resources are not utilised that does not mean they are unavailable.




This year Roy Wood and I are helping a man in his late 70's with a problem. 
He is a black box user who has used nothing more than Quill for many years. 
He now wants his  1/3rd lifetime's work converted to PC format to be 
available to his family. To do this he has bought a PC, QPC2, QPC Print, 
QL2PC Transfer and possibly also the Qmenu extensions. I recently spent 45 
minutes on the phone with him giving a telephone tutorial.


He employs a tutor to teach him how to use a PC, but has not yet mastered 
formatting a QL win disk and many other things. He is also still learning 
about emailing.


Up to a quarter of Quanta's members do not have access to email or the 
internet and have the right to help with their problems and a paper 
magazine.





But the real advantage of the down-loadable version is surely that any 
programme content, basic or assembler can used as is without having to 
type it all in  is that an I or an l or a 1 ?




Good point!

I think a straight forward WORD  doc is better than a pdf, more easily 
modifiable for printout, content, size and/or page order.




Have you compared file size .doc versus .pdf? As it happens I can print out 
more versatilely from .pdf than .doc. (Not all of us possess WORD. WORDPRO 
is a good alternative.)



And as for GWICKS quote :-
However no one on the Quanta Committee has experience of either so we 
would have to have external expertise.


Says it all in spades  why are they running a computer group ?



Another true story:

A member of the Quanta committee had a QL problem. He asked everyone he met 
for the solution, and no one, including many QL experts, could give him an 
answer. Then he asked a household name in the QL community and got his first 
definitive response:


If you don't know the answer to something as simple as that, then you are 
too stupid to use a computer!


I am sure that members  users interests would be better served by a 
coalition of traders, they have the expertise and an active scene is in 
their interest. Online conferenceing via Skype could replace travelling 
expenses too.




The traders can also be an ill disciplined bunch. Just try asking them for 
an advert in GIF or JPG format and see what you get back in return! (And 
that assumes you get a reply in the first place.)


Online conferencing is not as simple as its sounds. Jochen and I are trying 
to set up online facilities for urgent QL Today editorial conferences, but I 
am having problems with my server. The last Quanta committee meeting lasted 
for 4 hours. Would you really like to be sitting at your computer for that 
length of time? Sorry but  I like to have human contacts.


Wow! What a revelation! The Quanta Committee are human after all!

Best wishes,
Geoff 



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] was Turbo, now A4 A5

2005-08-13 Thread James Hunkins


On Aug 13, 2005, at 4:10 AM, gwicks wrote:
Online conferencing is not as simple as its sounds. Jochen and I are 
trying to set up online facilities for urgent QL Today editorial 
conferences, but I am having problems with my server. The last Quanta 
committee meeting lasted for 4 hours. Would you really like to be 
sitting at your computer for that length of time? Sorry but  I like to 
have human contacts.




On the other hand, it would allow some of us to participate who can't 
actually get there (small matter of an ocean in the way in my case).  I 
do phone and video conferences all the time and have taken to using 
video iChat nearly every day.  While obviously not as ideal on direct 1 
to 1 contact, it still is an opportunity that would be nice to have.


Cheers,
jim

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Dictionaries

2005-08-13 Thread Dilwyn Jones
That would be great. At least, it will be when that page works. 
There's something wrong with the URL which I can't yet figure out. The 
directory and page name are correct, both are in the correct case, yet 
they will not load (in Internet Exploder at least). The links use 
relative URLs in a table and all other links work online, the 
dictionaries page works offline but I can't get it to work online. I 
use HotMetal Pro to create the pages, so as I'm home all day tomorrow 
I'll take a more detailed look at the html to see if I can spot 
anything irregular - I know there are a couple of merged cells in that 
table just before or just after the broken link, so no doubt I'll be 
kicking myself when I see a major mistake staring me in the face!!!


It will be great to add your dictionaries as I know you did put a fair 
bit of work into reducing errors in the original word lists.


--
Dilwyn Jones

- Original Message - 
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Dictionaries




- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones

To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: QL News List
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 8:46 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Dictionaries

Obviously if anyone has more QTYP dictionaries I would be pleased to 
add them to the collection. Of all the QTYP language dictionaries I 
was able to locate, the one I want isn't among them - Welsh. If 
anyone can find a Welsh word list of suitable size for a spell 
checker (20,000+ words) on the web I would be very happy to receive 
a copy! All the ones I've been able to find are either too small or 
in a format I can't decode.


Some day I must get around to putting all my QTYP dictionaries on my 
website as I promised to do long, long ago.


For the record I have:

Danish  23,515 words
Dutch   52,612 words - 70,459 words - 180,130 words
French  208,913 words
German 165,935 words
Italian83,829 words
Norwegian  61,413 words
Spanish   174,846 words
Swiss German  165,810 words
English (UK + USA)  84,099 words - 194,433 words
English (UK)  65,197 words - 82,098 words
English (USA) 61,366 words - 77,722 words

I think I shall have to send these to you on CD by snailmail, 
Dilwyn.


BTW you can save QTYP dictionaries to a PC medium without them 
becoming corrupted as they are already compressed,


Best Wishes,
Geoff

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.2/65 - Release Date: 
07/08/2005







--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.2/65 - Release Date: 07/08/2005

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] website problem

2005-08-13 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Glad to say I've found the problem several people reported with my 
website's Dictionaries page after I added all the QTYP dictionaries 
last week. In fact, that page was affected by a combination of a rogue 
html tag which didn't show up in the TAGS view in my HTML editor, and 
a partially uploaded file.


I've not yet fixed the provblem with the message form page. You can 
get to it now, but not return from it to the main page until I find 
the problem with that.


(Just started a new job which has taken most of my time this week, 
insufficient processing capacity in my brain to cope with raw html at 
the moment!)


--
Dilwyn Jones



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.2/65 - Release Date: 07/08/2005

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Re:A4 A5

2005-08-13 Thread David Tubbs




Up to a quarter of Quanta's members do not have access to email or the 
internet and have the right to help with their problems and a paper magazine.
I really did think I had illustrated the difference between not USING 
access and not having it. as you describe it your man HAS the facility but 
like the Frenchman does not avail himself thereof.


Am well into  70's myself - what of it ?


Have you compared file size .doc versus .pdf?


Ofcourse, an example I recall doc with pix 500k  - pdf  75k., size not the 
point as much as ease of manipulation. It is easy to make a pdf from a doc, 
not so the reverse.


 As it happens I can print out more versatilely from .pdf than .doc. (Not 
all of us possess WORD. WORDPRO is a good alternative.)


If one needs an alternative to the most widely used word processor. 
Included with almost all new PC packages . And it is capable of saving in 
older version formats, even MacSpeak.


If docs too particular use rtf usually handleable by any processor.

 I know at least that were I to have the choice I would prefer to be able 
to drop the chairmans eulogy and other un useful verbiage, and to save or 
print that I so desired. not to mention run that included example programme.


There are substantial savings to be made, it is up to the majority to 
decide if all should bare the costs for the benefit of the few. Though it 
seems unlikely that democracy has much likelihood of manifestation.



The traders can also be an ill disciplined bunch. Just try asking them for 
an advert in GIF or JPG format and see what you get back in return! (And 
that assumes you get a reply in the first place.)
Whilst it is obvious that it is hardly commercial anymore it must be better 
that something exists rather than not.


I can understand a degree of reluctance, or lack of keenness to provide for 
the limited circulation of Quanta, quite apart from the poverty of 
presentation if the web site is anything to go on.



Online conferencing is not as simple as its sounds. Jochen and I are 
trying to set up online facilities for urgent QL Today editorial 
conferences, but I am having problems with my server. The last Quanta 
committee meeting lasted for 4 hours. Would you really like to be sitting 
at your computer for that length of time? Sorry but  I like to have human 
contacts.


Using PCphone does not require a great deal of at the computer, cost 
saving  was the motive rather than beer and jollies. I dont know but I 
would not be surprised if you spent more than the 4 hours travelling.


I have not seen the constitution or articles, but I would be surprised if 
the role of the committee members is not that of stewardship rather than 
Honour , prestige and kudos.




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.8/71 - Release Date: 12/08/2005


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm