On Thursday 10 February 2011 09:55:57 you wrote:
It is gratifying that some have tried to access my website.
I can now reveal that:
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website
http://gwiltprogs.info/
This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@).
Hi
On 11 Feb 2011, at 10:17, Alex Wells wrote:
Do you have a non-SMSQ version of Sud? I would like to run it in uQLx
(Minerva rom) and have not tried hacking it myself yet.
I'm afraid Sud at the moment needs SMSQ/E and a screen size bigger than 706x406.
George
It is gratifying that some have tried to access my website.
I can now reveal that:
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.info/
This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@).
Thus 46 can now be entered as one of:
46
$2E
@56
%101110
On 9 Feb 2011, at 20:47, Tony Firshman wrote:
Tobias Fröschle wrote, on 9/Feb/11 19:53 | Feb9:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman:
I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10.
Tony
If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12
: 10 February 2011 09:56
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated
It is gratifying that some have tried to access my website.
I can now reveal that:
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website
http://gwiltprogs.info/
This allows the input of octal numbers by using
On 10/02/2011 10:52, Adrian Ives wrote:
btw George, did you know that the links to SUDOKU and UCONFIG on your
download page are broken?
Are you updating the SUDOKU Solver to support octal as well? ;)
I am sure the SUDOKU solver already supports octal natively...
--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
On 10 Feb 2011, at 10:52, Adrian Ives wrote:
btw George, did you know that the links to SUDOKU and UCONFIG on your
download page are broken?
No. Try them now. Thanks for telling me.
Are you updating the SUDOKU Solver to support octal as well? ;)
Hmmm! What is it now? Nonal and
gdgqler wrote, on 10/02/2011 10:00:
On 9 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Tobias Fröschle wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman:
I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10.
Tony
If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12 fingers as well.
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.com/
This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@).
Thus 46 can now be entered as one of:
46
$2E
@56
%101110
George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
-- A new version of GWASS is now available from my website
http://gwiltprogs.com/
--
-- This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@).
--
-- Thus 46 can now be entered as one of:
-- 46
-- $2E
-- @56
-- %101110
At last!
Was waiting for years for an opportunity to get that
On 09/02/11 16:51, tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote:
Why can't programmers tell Christmas from Halloween?
Because DEC 25 is OCT 31!
Oh dear, bad jokes R us!
There are 10 types of developer in the world, those who understand
binary and those who don't!
Cheers,
Norman.
--
Norman Dunbar
Norman Dunbar wrote, on 9/Feb/11 17:21 | Feb9:
On 09/02/11 16:51, tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote:
Why can't programmers tell Christmas from Halloween?
Because DEC 25 is OCT 31!
Oh dear, bad jokes R us!
There are 10 types of developer in the world, those who understand
binary and those
:21
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website
http://gwiltprogs.com/
This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@).
Thus 46 can now be entered as one of:
46
$2E
@56
%101110
George
)
Lee Privett
-
Sent from my Laptop running XP
but emulating the QL using QPC2
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman t...@firshman.co.uk
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman:
I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10.
Tony
If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12 fingers as well.
That's 20% faster typing we had 20% more software for the QL
Cheers,
Tobias
Tobias Fröschle wrote, on 9/Feb/11 19:53 | Feb9:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman:
I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10.
Tony
If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12 fingers as well.
That's 20% faster typing we had 20% more
-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website
http://gwiltprogs.com/
This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@).
Thus 46 can now be entered as one of:
46
$2E
@56
%101110
George
17 matches
Mail list logo