Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-11 Thread Alex Wells
On Thursday 10 February 2011 09:55:57 you wrote: It is gratifying that some have tried to access my website. I can now reveal that: A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.info/ This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@). Hi

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-11 Thread gdgqler
On 11 Feb 2011, at 10:17, Alex Wells wrote: Do you have a non-SMSQ version of Sud? I would like to run it in uQLx (Minerva rom) and have not tried hacking it myself yet. I'm afraid Sud at the moment needs SMSQ/E and a screen size bigger than 706x406. George

[Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-10 Thread gdgqler
It is gratifying that some have tried to access my website. I can now reveal that: A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.info/ This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@). Thus 46 can now be entered as one of: 46 $2E @56 %101110

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-10 Thread gdgqler
On 9 Feb 2011, at 20:47, Tony Firshman wrote: Tobias Fröschle wrote, on 9/Feb/11 19:53 | Feb9: Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman: I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10. Tony If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-10 Thread Adrian Ives
: 10 February 2011 09:56 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated It is gratifying that some have tried to access my website. I can now reveal that: A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.info/ This allows the input of octal numbers by using

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-10 Thread Rich Mellor
On 10/02/2011 10:52, Adrian Ives wrote: btw George, did you know that the links to SUDOKU and UCONFIG on your download page are broken? Are you updating the SUDOKU Solver to support octal as well? ;) I am sure the SUDOKU solver already supports octal natively... -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-10 Thread gdgqler
On 10 Feb 2011, at 10:52, Adrian Ives wrote: btw George, did you know that the links to SUDOKU and UCONFIG on your download page are broken? No. Try them now. Thanks for telling me. Are you updating the SUDOKU Solver to support octal as well? ;) Hmmm! What is it now? Nonal and

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-10 Thread Tony Firshman
gdgqler wrote, on 10/02/2011 10:00: On 9 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Tobias Fröschle wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman: I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10. Tony If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12 fingers as well.

[Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread gdgqler
A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.com/ This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@). Thus 46 can now be entered as one of: 46 $2E @56 %101110 George ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread tobias.froesc...@t-online.de
-- A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.com/ -- -- This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@). -- -- Thus 46 can now be entered as one of: -- 46 -- $2E -- @56 -- %101110 At last! Was waiting for years for an opportunity to get that

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 09/02/11 16:51, tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote: Why can't programmers tell Christmas from Halloween? Because DEC 25 is OCT 31! Oh dear, bad jokes R us! There are 10 types of developer in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't! Cheers, Norman. -- Norman Dunbar

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Tony Firshman
Norman Dunbar wrote, on 9/Feb/11 17:21 | Feb9: On 09/02/11 16:51, tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote: Why can't programmers tell Christmas from Halloween? Because DEC 25 is OCT 31! Oh dear, bad jokes R us! There are 10 types of developer in the world, those who understand binary and those

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Adrian Ives
:21 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.com/ This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@). Thus 46 can now be entered as one of: 46 $2E @56 %101110 George

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Lee Privett
) Lee Privett - Sent from my Laptop running XP but emulating the QL using QPC2 - Original Message - From: Tony Firshman t...@firshman.co.uk To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Tobias Fröschle
Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman: I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10. Tony If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12 fingers as well. That's 20% faster typing we had 20% more software for the QL Cheers, Tobias

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Tony Firshman
Tobias Fröschle wrote, on 9/Feb/11 19:53 | Feb9: Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2011, 19:05 + schrieb Tony Firshman: I wish we had 12 digits - base 12 is *so* much better than base 10. Tony If we had 12 digits, we'd probably have 12 fingers as well. That's 20% faster typing we had 20% more

Re: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated

2011-02-09 Thread Adrian Ives
-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] GWASS is updated A new version of GWASS is now available from my website http://gwiltprogs.com/ This allows the input of octal numbers by using the prefix AT (@). Thus 46 can now be entered as one of: 46 $2E @56 %101110 George