mbox has changed to Mailbox

2000-03-15 Thread Grimshaw Stuart
I have been running qmail at home for a couple of months now, with no problems what so ever. However, toward the end of last week, I had a problem with an email (my ISP's newsletter!!) that didn't have cr's followed by lf's or whatever. Anyway, to cut a story short, I ended up upgrading to the

Re: mbox has changed to Mailbox

2000-03-15 Thread Manfred Bartz
Grimshaw Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been running qmail at home for a couple of months now, with no problems what so ever. However, toward the end of last week, I had a problem with an email (my ISP's newsletter!!) that didn't have cr's followed by lf's or whatever. Anyway, to

qmail Digest 15 Mar 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 941

2000-03-15 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 15 Mar 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 941 Topics (messages 38509 through 38564): [Q] qmail with 38509 by: Hong Taeki 38510 by: Magnus Bodin qmail-inject question 38511 by: Jan Stifter 38512 by: Magnus Bodin 38514 by: Yuliy Minchev Throughput

Re: Problem with daemontools 0.70

2000-03-15 Thread D. J. Bernstein
The RedHat 5.1 poll() emulation library fails to clear revents when select() returns 0. This caused DNS lookups to loop when they should have timed out. Version 0.87 of ucspi-tcp has a workaround. ---Dan

Re: mbox has changed to Mailbox

2000-03-15 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:43:29PM +1100, Manfred Bartz wrote: Grimshaw Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is the only thing that has changed, followed by a reboot because I hit the wrong power switch (don't ask). Since qmail was back up and running the mail has started to be

qmailanalog examples howto

2000-03-15 Thread Andrés
Thanks a lot. It gave me that error but it worked :-) (my files are named "@*"). It doesn't delete any file. Now I'm going to try all the z* utilities. I have a question: Was I supposed to know how I had to do ALL these things? How, with paranormal power? Hehehehe, thanks a lot again :-) I'm

OE4/5 fix

2000-03-15 Thread petervd
My friend reports: 'increase the smtp server timeout in outlook' (Tools-Services-Internet mail-Advanced). Greetz, Peter. -- Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder | | 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; | C++ makes it harder, but when you do it

Re: qmail equiv of sendmail access.db and genericstable?

2000-03-15 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi, again. At 17:30 14.3.2000 -0500, you wrote: How do I go about doing this with qmail? Esp since I will be sending this mail unaltered from the old mailserver to the new qmail host (in the mailhub setup, your client doesnt touch the headers, its all up to the mailhub right?) I

qmail and uscpi-tcp

2000-03-15 Thread Pierre-Yves DESLANDES
Hi everybody, i'm using Qmail with tcpserver.And i can't manage to use my mail server to forward outgoing messages. I have put a smtproutes file in my qmail control directory with : :smtp.myprovider.net but i think i should modify my smtp.rules and my smtp.cdb in /etc/tcpcontrol. What

Re: qmail and uscpi-tcp

2000-03-15 Thread Mads E Eilertsen
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Pierre-Yves DESLANDES wrote: Hi everybody, i'm using Qmail with tcpserver.And i can't manage to use my mail server to forward outgoing messages. What happens when you try to send a message? What does the log say? Mads

Re: qmail and uscpi-tcp

2000-03-15 Thread Pierre-Yves DESLANDES
yes sorry i forgot to give the log : '553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)' - Original Message - From: Mads E Eilertsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 3:32 PM Subject: Re: qmail and uscpi-tcp On Wed, 15 Mar 2000,

Re: qmail equiv of sendmail access.db and genericstable?

2000-03-15 Thread Charles Cazabon
anindya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I agree that we should be setting these things in the MUA, but let me ask you an embarassingly stupid question. sendmail masquerading feature -- how does qmail deal with this? I have a box where people have shell access, which has a name

Re: qmail and uscpi-tcp

2000-03-15 Thread Charles Cazabon
Pierre-Yves DESLANDES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, i'm using Qmail with tcpserver.And i can't manage to use my mail server to forward outgoing messages. I have put a smtproutes file in my qmail control directory with : :smtp.myprovider.net but i think i should modify my smtp.rules

SMTP authentication?

2000-03-15 Thread Reuben King
All my users use Outlook 2000 and Outlook Express 5... Both of which support SMTP authentication. Is there a good implementation of this for Qmail? It would strike me (as an ignorant newbie) as a better alternative to relay control than tcpserver... Any thoughts? TIA, -R

Re: SMTP authentication?

2000-03-15 Thread Krzysztof Dabrowski
At 09:19 2000-03-15 -0600, Reuben King wrote: All my users use Outlook 2000 and Outlook Express 5... Both of which support SMTP authentication. Is there a good implementation of this for Qmail? It would strike me (as an ignorant newbie) as a better alternative to relay control than

Re: Why fstat() in qmail-send.c:markdone()?

2000-03-15 Thread Fred Lindberg
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:42:15 -0600, Fred Lindberg wrote: fd = open_write(fn.s); if (fd == -1) break; if (fstat(fd,st) == -1) { close(fd); break; } if (seek_set(fd,pos) == -1) { close(fd); break; } Ok, I get it. qmail-send doesn't trust qmailq. Without the fstat() call, qmailq could

qmail and ucspi-tcp succeeded

2000-03-15 Thread Pierre-Yves DESLANDES
I succeed in this way. First i deleted the rcpthosts file i had in my qmail control directory But someone (Petr Novotny) that i thanks, explained me it was a wrong way. So i put it back and modify my smtp rules which i compiled. And now it works ... Thanks all, Bye ...

Re: Why fstat() in qmail-send.c:markdone()?

2000-03-15 Thread Dave Sill
"Fred Lindberg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: call, qmailq could (via symlink) cause qmail-send (root) to write to an qmail-send runs as qmails, not root. -Dave

Re: Why fstat() in qmail-send.c:markdone()?

2000-03-15 Thread Fred Lindberg
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:59:11 -0500 (EST), Dave Sill wrote: qmail-send runs as qmails, not root. Yes. And the file in question is owned by qmails not qmailq in a directory writable only by qmails. If open fails to report an error, this should become obvious in write(). The fstat() info is not

Increasing deferral time

2000-03-15 Thread Chuck Milam
I provide secondary MX service for a site that may be down for more than 10 days. I would like to increase my deferral/spooling time to something longer than the default (I believe it's 7 days under qmail?). Can this be done without getting to deep under the qmail hood? -- Chuck Milam -

Re: Increasing deferral time

2000-03-15 Thread Charles Cazabon
Chuck Milam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I provide secondary MX service for a site that may be down for more than 10 days. I would like to increase my deferral/spooling time to something longer than the default (I believe it's 7 days under qmail?). Can this be done without getting to deep

Re: Increasing deferral time

2000-03-15 Thread Dave Sill
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chuck Milam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I provide secondary MX service for a site that may be down for more than 10 days. I would like to increase my deferral/spooling time to something longer than the default (I believe it's 7 days under qmail?).

RE: Bounce Loops?

2000-03-15 Thread smanjourides
Title: RE: Bounce Loops? Hmmm, I guess I wasn't asking exactly what I want. I need to know how QMail detects a message as being a bounced bounce. Example: Mr.Spammer sends email to my QMail server. The envelope has a non-existent return address. The msg is sent to a non-existent user on my

Re: Bounce Loops?

2000-03-15 Thread Adam McKenna
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:41:45AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, I guess I wasn't asking exactly what I want. I need to know how QMail detects a message as being a bounced bounce. Example: Mr.Spammer sends email to my QMail server. The envelope has a non-existent return

Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Dan Barber
Can anyone recommend a good web interface for qmail with maildirs, virtualhosts and sql backend which includes an addressbook and is relatively easy to configure? thanks Dan

Additional Request -- Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Scott D. Yelich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Dan Barber wrote: Can anyone recommend a good web interface for qmail with maildirs, virtualhosts and sql backend which includes an addressbook and is relatively easy to configure? and one that doesn't require 15 other small packages to

Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Bill Parker
At 01:57 PM 3/15/00 -0500, you wrote: Can anyone recommend a good web interface for qmail with maildirs, virtualhosts and sql backend which includes an addressbook and is relatively easy to configure? Take a look at qmail-admin and vpopmail at http://www.inter7.com -Bill

RE: Additional Request -- Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Reuben King
Well, wouldn't you just like your cake and eat it too... :-) -Original Message- From: Scott D. Yelich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 1:10 PM To: Dan Barber Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Additional Request -- Re: Web interface -BEGIN PGP

Re: Bounce Loops?

2000-03-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No. If you installed qmail correctly, you would have created an account called mailer-daemon, which is required to be RFC compliant. I believe the only required e-mail account is postmaster. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

RE: Additional Request -- Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Scott D. Yelich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Reuben King wrote: Well, wouldn't you just like your cake and eat it too... :-) Hey, I didn't ask for DOCUMENTATION did I? Scott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.2

Re: Additional Request -- Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Olivier M.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Dan Barber wrote: Can anyone recommend a good web interface for qmail with maildirs, virtualhosts and sql backend which includes an addressbook and is relatively

Re: Bounce Loops?

2000-03-15 Thread Adam McKenna
Really? I thought root and mailer-daemon were requirements. OK, how about "If you installed qmail according to the instructions in my HOWTO, LWQ or README.alias" :) --Adam On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:37:08AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No. If you

Re: Bounce Loops?

2000-03-15 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:37:08AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No. If you installed qmail correctly, you would have created an account called mailer-daemon, which is required to be RFC compliant. I believe the only required e-mail account is

dot-qmail Files

2000-03-15 Thread Christopher Tarricone
I am using vpopmail and I am wondering were my .qmail files go if I want to forward to another e-mail address... Any Ideas?

instantly processed

2000-03-15 Thread Casey Zacek
Well, this might be a stupid question, so I'm sorry in advance. I just setup a qmail server (my first) for an outgoing queueing relay server for us and our customers. From the moment I installed it, the "instant processing" hasn't been happening. Messages always get queued, and will be

Re: instantly processed

2000-03-15 Thread Kai MacTane
At 3/15/2000 04:58 PM -0600, Casey Zacek wrote or quoted: I just setup a qmail server (my first) for an outgoing queueing relay server for us and our customers. From the moment I installed it, the "instant processing" hasn't been happening. Messages always get queued, and will be processed

RE: Additional Request -- Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Reuben King
I might suggest looking into something like Cold Fusion or Tango, both of which are available for Linux. For ultra simplicity, CF or Tango against MS Access as a database is often used (and is actually quite robust considering the amount of brain damage needed to use it)... Of course, Access is

Re: Additional Request -- Re: Web interface

2000-03-15 Thread Olivier M.
Hi Dan, On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:23:18PM -0500, Dan Barber wrote: I love it! It looks tons better than everything else I've seen so far. Are there any modifications to getting it to work with qmail, both local users and virtuals? Will work in any case, I'm currently working on it (well,