tweaked qmail-scanner to do something of that nature. Let me know offlist
if you're interested in my freaky deaky Perl extravaganza.
Jerry Lynde
System Administrator
US Investigative Services
At 09:27 AM 8/7/2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Jerry Lynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You did say specific user, yes? The FAQ covers making copies of every
user's email, not specifically one user... Either that or I'm still waking
up (or both.)
This is what the Unix philosophy is all about
/badmailfrom
Please?
Jerry Lynde
You know... the virus, I don't mind qmail-scanner-queue.pl
places it quietly and calmly into the quarantine, sends me and email, and
we all get on with our lives. The part that sucks is the hordes of email
notices to the list about the virus from every anti-viral program on the
Howdy folks,
Here's the deal
I installed vpopmail about halfway yesterday, just enough to break mail
delivery.
vpopmail took over diligence.com as a virtual domain with no users, and
started bouncing
messages... Does anyone know a way to get those bounced messages back here?
I've got local
Howdy folks,
Here's the deal
I installed vpopmail about halfway yesterday, just enough to break mail
delivery.
vpopmail took over diligence.com as a virtual domain with no users, and
started bouncing
messages... Does anyone know a way to get those bounced messages back here?
I've got local
At 10:30 AM 2/27/2001, fred wrote:
Hello
I use qmail-1.03 on a redhat 7.0
I have followed all the instruction in the "life with qmail" doc.
TEST.delivery and TEST.receive are good.
I can send and read local messages but I am unable to use virtualdomain.
My dns and Mx are good.
It seems to be
At 05:54 PM 2/14/2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:10:16PM +0100, Rembrandt Lensink wrote:
[virus crap]
Could you please pretty *please* stop bothering us with this virus
bullshit? We don't care, ok?
Greetz, Peter.
Actually, Peter... I care... really, I do
Please pretty
At 04:12 PM 2/15/2001, qiao aijun wrote:
I wan't switch syslog to multilog. I could't find log file in /var/log/qmail
after I changed qmail rc file and restart the machine.
The following is my rc file.
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
# Using qmail-local to deliver
At 03:11 PM 2/12/2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Jesse Sunday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just cleared the queue of a lot of mails spawned by the 'virus' ~ If
anyone can point me to how to filter certain types of attachments I would
really appreciate it...
Everything you need is
At 03:16 PM 1/26/2001, you wrote:
Sorry for being such a dunce. I have been there many times and just didn't
pay attention to the title. Please ignore and don't flame . . .(hiding)
heh too late... there are some on this list who are simply laying in wait for
an opportunity to flame at any sign
At 07:21 PM 1/15/2001, you wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
If you want to use bloated, unreliable, immensely fat software with a
Where I have written, that EACH patch? Only USEFUL patch.
The world goes forward!
Ah...but what is useful to thee may not be useful to me :o)
inst the
day when I might need them.
I say, keep the status quo. It's beautiful, don't change a thing.
Jerry Lynde,
Devoted qmail Advocate
At 04:09 PM 12/22/2000, Dennis wrote:
Hello to one and all (especially the list managers)
Can I make a suggestion
Why don't we prefix the subject header with [qmail].
It makes filtering a lot easier.
feedback ?
what about a filter like the one I use?
Header any recipient contains "[EMAIL
At 03:53 PM 11/17/2000, you wrote:
test
you get an A for being to the point, and an F for being obscure...which
averages to a C.. you pass... but next time you should give it more effort
Delete it. Seriously... the don't delete this message email is some legacy
stuff from older implementations of pop3 mailboxes. When I worked at an
ISP, we upgraded the mail server and our entire client base got those emails.
Just ignore them, delete them and move along
Jerry Lynde
At 05:36 PM 11/15/2000, you wrote:
Can anyone explain me how I leave this list? Please, somebody tell me...
Thanks
you can unsub anytime you like, but you can never leave
it's just like subscribing, only backwards...
You don't mean the Fahrenheit error, do you? That one means that your
qmail-send has processed one too many flames. ;o)
At 09:20 AM 11/3/2000, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Tom Laudeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to prevent qmail smtp from sending error 451?
Why would you want to?
At 11:10 AM 11/3/2000, Aaron L. Meehan wrote:
Quoting Howard Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Oh and I posted this to the mailing list as well. I am sure everybody
will be interested! in your behaviour!!
Excuse me, Howie, but STOP posting private messages to the list
just to spite people. We
At 03:51 PM 10/18/2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having problems stopping relaying.
I created the file /etc/tcprules.d/qmail-smtpd
and in there I put
203.41.132.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
203.42.53.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
then
cd /etc/tcprules.d/
and
tcprules qmail-smtpd.cdb qmail-smtpd.temp
Reminds me of the way spam/trolls/etc. was treated on alt.sex.cthulhu few
years back...
had to say somehting...I'll be quiet now
Jer
At 03:00 PM 10/5/2000, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:33:22PM +, Wheres Mybrudda wrote:
Hello. Is this the right place to come for help
At 05:33 PM 10/5/2000, Brett Randall wrote:
Reminds me of the way spam/trolls/etc. was treated on alt.sex.cthulhu few
years back...
had to say somehting...I'll be quiet now
Ahem? :
What?
Jer
At 04:45 PM 10/5/2000, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 09:35:06AM +1000, Brett Randall wrote:
strace /dev/gf0
No, I think you've got it wrong. I think its strace /dev/gf6 at the
moment...
That depends on your interface renumbering standards. Rebooting in
between relations is a good
At 12:15 AM 9/20/2000, you wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm using qmail and Unix.
I'm using Life with qmail.
I'm chosing the Maildir.
I'don't know how an account in /etc/passwd can be a "normal" user for
qmail.
When a send a mail to user (in /etc/passwd) and I open the
/var/log/syslog, I
find that
At 01:05 PM 9/20/2000, you wrote:
Jerry Lynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you run qmail-pw2u and qmail-newu ??
If not, then even though the users are valid (meaning listed in
/etc/passwd) qmail doesn't know about them...
Not true. The use of qmail-users (users/assign) is completely
optional
)
Thanks,
Jerry Lynde
System Administrator
Due Diligence Inc.
http://www.diligence.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (406) 728-0001 x232
Fax: (406) 728-0006
At 11:33 AM 9/7/2000, Jerry Lynde wrote:
Hello all,
I have a quick feature question. Our old mail server (an NT
based, web administered thinger) had the capability to mark mail as read
if it had been accessed via POP, but not deleted. Does anyone know if
qmail can do this? If so
ks Michael !!
Jer
At 03:40 PM 9/7/2000, you wrote:
isn't that what the "cur" directory is used for?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Lynde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail marked as read??
28 matches
Mail list logo
