Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-18 Thread Jenny Holmberg
Dale Miracle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aug 15 22:14:31 atlas qmail: 966392071.402535 starting delivery 662: msg 28806 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aug 15 22:14:31 atlas qmail: 966392071.404950 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 Aug 15 22:14:48 atlas qmail: 966392088.232922 delivery 662:

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-18 Thread Dave Sill
Jenny Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aug 15 22:14:48 atlas qmail: 966392088.232922 delivery 662: deferral: Connected_to_152.163.224.66_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_421_SERVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE,_TEMPORARY_DNS_FAILURE/ This is due to AOL returning too big a DNS record when you

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-18 Thread Jenny Holmberg
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How do you figure that? Looks like AOL is rejecting the message because it's having DNS problems. Not enough coffee - impaired reading comprehension. My apologies for a completely erroneous answer. A third alternative to the too-big-DNS-reply problem is

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-17 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Quoting Dale Miracle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): "Ihnen, David" wrote: [...] SO - My conclusion is that the system *MUST* be talking to some other service, than qmail-smtpd, or it would say something more like "syntax error (#5.5.4)" or "out of memory (#4.3.0)", rather than just "4.7.1".

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-17 Thread Dale Miracle
"Aaron L. Meehan" wrote: Quoting Dale Miracle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): "Ihnen, David" wrote: [...] SO - My conclusion is that the system *MUST* be talking to some other service, than qmail-smtpd, or it would say something more like "syntax error (#5.5.4)" or "out of memory (#4.3.0)",

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-16 Thread Ben Beuchler
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 01:55:08AM -0400, Dale Miracle wrote: I noticed a lot more e-mail activity lately and noticed people are sending to 5, 10, 15 people at a time. You get a couple people doing that and the 20 connection limit in qmail's smtpd is pegged until it can deliver the mail. I

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-16 Thread Dale Miracle
Ben Beuchler wrote: If you review the man page for qmail-smtpd, it will explain the usage of "concurrencyremote" which should solve your problem. Thanks for reply. I forgot to check thatI guess I wasn't thinking. I knew I had seen it somewhere. I looked through the install read me

RE: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-16 Thread Ihnen, David
-Original Message- From: Ben Beuchler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] If you review the man page for qmail-smtpd, it will explain the usage of "concurrencyremote" which should solve your problem. Ben, that doesn't make sense. First of all, from man qmail-control

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-16 Thread Dale Miracle
"Ihnen, David" wrote: Ben, that doesn't make sense. First of all, from man qmail-control concurrencylocal10 qmail-send concurrencyremote 20 qmail-send these files are controlled by qmail-send Secondly, concurrency of

RE: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-16 Thread Ihnen, David
acle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 2:24 PM To: Ihnen, David Cc: qmail list Subject: Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client "Ihnen, David" wrote: Ben, that doesn't make sense. First of all, from man qmail-control con

Re: 4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-16 Thread Dale Miracle
"Ihnen, David" wrote: Dale: Although your remote concurrency DOES appear to be a problem, I do not believe this is the problem encountered by the netscape user. If you have extended periods of time during which you have 20/20 connections used, by all means, raise the remote concurrency

4.7.1 error reported to netscape mail client

2000-08-15 Thread Dale Miracle
I had posted this previously to the list and got some replies back on what I can do to fix the problem. I raised the number of connections that tcpserver would accept. I got another e-mail from the same user saying he is still every so often getting this error. This isn't something qmail is