Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-15 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Andy Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: list especially has been known to have delays of up to at least 3 hours before emails that are sent actually show up in my mailbox. I still remember the days where it was nearly always below 30 seconds. Flamewars developed much faster :) Regards,

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-15 Thread Dave Sill
Andy Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wouldn't be hard to configure your Gnus to add the mail-followup-to header for this list. Better yet, create a file containing a list of mailing lists, e.g.: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... And set the QMAILMFTFILE environment variable

Re: Handling high volume lists (was: Newbies vs. arrogant experts)

2001-05-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:18:45AM +0200, Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ยท dupes (like, I am on this list and only a complete retard would send me a Cc: (which makes approx. 31 retards per month which, in return, makes me wonder when the prices for anti-personnel ammo will

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-14 Thread Robin S. Socha
* Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:18:45AM +0200, Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [dupes] Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see a Mail-Followup-To header in your message. Are people supposed to guess whether or not you are on the list or whether or not you

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-14 Thread Chris Garrigues
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 14 May 2001 22:30:00 +0200 * Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:18:45AM +0200, Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] et wrote: [dupes] Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see a Mail-Followup-To header in your message.

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-14 Thread Jason Brooke
Everyone here is on this list unless otherwise stated. Noone therefore wants Cc:s unless otherwise stated. How long have you been in a technical environment? http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html You are one hell of a luser. pots, kettles, black jason

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-14 Thread peter green
* Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010514 17:13]: * Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:18:45AM +0200, Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [dupes] Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see a Mail-Followup-To header in your message. Are people supposed to guess

Re: Handling high volume lists

2001-05-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Robin S. Socha on 14 May 2001 22:30:00 +0200: Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see a Mail-Followup-To header in your message. Are people supposed to guess whether or not you are on the list or whether or not you want a cc header listing your address so that your mail filter can

Handling high volume lists (was: Newbies vs. arrogant experts)

2001-05-13 Thread Robin S. Socha
* Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010512 20:57]: Chris Garrigues writes: As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because of the newbies). I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a day. It's kind of handy, because I can see the

Re: Handling high volume lists (was: Newbies vs. arrogant experts)

2001-05-13 Thread Chris Garrigues
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 13 May 2001 10:18:45 +0200 * Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010512 20:57]: Chris Garrigues writes: As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because of the newbies). I send qmail list traffic into its