Piotr Kasztelowicz writes:
Qmail is one MTA only, which suports and propagates ORBS "moral"
Who does this? Not me. If anybody asks about ORBS, I tell them not
to use it.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | The best way
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
Hello, this list is for discussion of qmail, if you wish to discuss orbs
please take this to SPAM-L or elsewhere.
The answer for all subscibers, Adam, I am not sure that this is disscusion
for spam-l rather than qmail list.
Qmail is one MTA only,
Qmail is one MTA only, which suports and propagates ORBS "moral" and
technical thus availablility to connect with qmail platform to ORBS
and reject mail from listed by ORBS hosts.
Neither sendmail nor postfix is interested with ORBS anty-spam system and don't
support ORBS.
The ORBS system
[sorry but this was just too much...]
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 01:33:22PM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Qmail is one MTA only, which suports and propagates ORBS "moral" and
technical thus availablility to connect with qmail platform to ORBS
and reject mail from listed by ORBS hosts.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 01:33:22PM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
Hello, this list is for discussion of qmail, if you wish to discuss orbs
please take this to SPAM-L or elsewhere.
The answer for all subscibers, Adam, I am not sure that this is
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:08:33AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
It not difficult to spuppose, that if MTA were old and
insecure=possible for open relay the rest of sotwares
are insecure too.
There are many insecure hosts that are not on the ORBS list simply
because they are not running an
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg wrote:
This is NOT true, and you are way off mark.
1. There is no official support of ORBS to my knowledge from QMAIL and its authors,
not in the way you are implying in your posting to this list.
2. Sendmail and postfix and ALL other
Hello
I will say about my experience with ORBS (as network administrator)
because the peoples associated with qmail have given good recommendation
to
use and base on ORBS as good anti-spam method.
I let to be another opinion!
After crush of one of Polish Cardiac Society's Server placed in
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 01:35:20AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
I will say about my experience with ORBS (as network administrator)
because the peoples associated with qmail have given good recommendation
to
use and base on ORBS as good anti-spam method.
I let to be another opinion!
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alex Pennace wrote:
The story I got so far is ORBS tested your machine and found it to be
an open relay. You fixed it and ORBS tested you again. Meanwhile there
were isolated connection attempts from Romania and a system crash you
haven't firmly correlated to anything
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:14:57AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
The hackers read ORBS data base called by its "insecure hosts"
and apply to break hosts direclty from list!
ORBS only lists hosts that are open mail relays. ORBS doesn't list
hosts that are not open relays but have other
Hello
ORBS only lists hosts that are open mail relays. ORBS doesn't list
hosts that are not open relays but have other vulnerabilities.
ORBS is not a list of hosts with insecure telnet daemons.
ORBS is not a list of hosts with insecure ftp daemons.
It not difficult to spuppose, that if
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:08:55AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Send mail to ORBS and try to resolve this with them.
ORBS has ignored all letters and will not stop scanning
of my host
Hello, this list is for discussion of qmail, if you wish to discuss orbs
please take this to SPAM-L or
13 matches
Mail list logo
