On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 05:02:46PM -0700, Harry wrote:
hi all,
I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive and send emails through SQWEB
mail, but i am not able to get my emails through outlook express. I get error there
was problem logging onto your mail server. Your passowrd
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not able to connect through outlook express
hi all,
I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive and send emails through
SQWEB mail, but i am not able to get my emails through outlook express. I
get error
hi all,
I have qmail running on linux, i am able to receive
and send emails through SQWEB mail, but i am not able to get my emails through
outlook express. I get error " there was problem logging onto your mail server.
Your passowrd was rejected. Protocol:POP3, Server Response:-ER
hi i am new to this list. I have qmail runnuing. I am able to send and
recieve email via the sqwebmail but my password is rejected when i try to
connect through outlook.
I do not have postfix running, does this matter?
Any help.
harvinder
- Original Message -
From: george [EMAIL
We have been having trouble getting qmail to communicate with certain
Outlook Express customers. This is probably a problem with Outlook,
but I thought maybe some of you might have had experience with this. The
problem occurs when customers try to send mail out through are qmail
server
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1222
From: "Robin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:25:56 -1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: outlook and outlook express
Hello everyone,
We have recent
you need to set up their PCs with the correct local time.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, you wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have recently changed to Qmail and since doing so anyone with outlook and
outlook express is logging time at grenwich time How do we change the
time, oh by the way in the mail
Hello everyone,
We have recently changed to Qmail and since doing so anyone with outlook and
outlook express is logging time at grenwich time How do we change the
time, oh by the way in the mail itself the time is correct just not in the
log in the inbox.
Robin
- Original Message -
From: "Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Qmail-List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank
* Hubbard, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
Show
: eibo(at)newmedia.no
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 05:46:02PM -03
Quoting Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Hubbard, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar
abomination and I won't show you the difference.
snip
So
Right. You're still using Outlook on a technical mailing list.
So? You're still a moron - yet that doesn't stop you.
Besides, he's using Outlook Express, not Outlook
message still looks bad, has no reference headers (cf. "broken list
archive") and so on.
Looks fine from here. Alp
Quoting James Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Without going into a 20 page technical look at every bug here's some
simple tips even biggeners should know.
1. Don't use the 'Preview' plane.
2. Don't let or set Outlook to open messages automatically.
3. Don't open any executable or any other
, Aaron "L." Meehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding Re: Outlook Express Prank:
Quoting James Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Without going into a 20 page technical look at every bug here's some
simple tips even biggeners should know.
1. Don't use the 'Preview' plane.
2. Don't
Great! The last thing I expected to have to do when I came into work today
was to deal with some asshole who thought it would be funny to fuck with
everyone using IE. Even funnier are the idiots who reply back to the same
post. Now that my client is pretty much fucked any suggestions on how I
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:03:49PM -0600, dG wrote:
Great! The last thing I expected to have to do when I came into work today
was to deal with some asshole who thought it would be funny to fuck with
everyone using IE. Even funnier are the idiots who reply back to the same
post. Now that
quot;dG" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Outlook Express bug
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:29:39PM -0600, dG wrote:
Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. For me it was a
huge annoyance which pissed me off but there are hundreds and thousands of
people out there who are not technical in any way for whom this would be a
major crisis.
that my client is pretty much fucked any suggestions on how I can
get these damn emails off my machine since everytime I try to delete them
they lock up.
Don't open them. If you don't open them, they won't hurt you. If you've opened
one and Outlook Express locks up, kill Outlook Express, start it back
nt: Monday, December 11, 2000 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Outlook Express bug
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:04:11PM -0600, dG wrote:
Great! The last thing I expected to have to do when I came into work
today
was to deal with some asshole who thought it would be funny to fuck
with
ever
boys and girls,
this is not reasonable.
Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you
wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very
unfriendly. No one deserves being crashed by a prankster, and nobody is
expecting such uncivil behaviour in
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:46:02PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote:
Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you
wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very
unfriendly. No one deserves being crashed by a prankster, and nobody is
expecting such
Hi,
Could somebody resend me the original post concerning this? It seems I
deleted it on accident and it may have been removed from the list
archives...
Thanks,
Mike
In the immortal words of Alex Pennace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No one deserves to be censored because some people made a poor choice
for their MUA.
At what point, exactly, did asking someone to act like (a) a
professional and (b) a decent human being become censorship?
Oh, right, the same point
Thus spake martin langhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
this is not reasonable.
Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you
wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very
unfriendly. No one deserves being crashed by a prankster, and nobody is
What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
-Original Message-
From: Felix von Leitner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank
Doesn't it seem a little idiotic to use Outlook on a
mailing list about
Alex,
this is not a call for censorchip, please! We are on a public list!
I'm asking for a bit of professionalism. Whoever posted that practical
joke was doing it on purpose -- and that's not professional at all.
Professionals know that it takes a lot of work to build, and very
* Hubbard, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar abomination
and I won't show you the difference.
Recommended reading for obvious newbies like yourself:
http://learn.to/attribute/
Felix von Leitner wrote:
Doesn't it seem a little idiotic to use Outlook on a
mailing list about an Unix MTA?
We are on the *internet*. Welcome.
Many people, many machines, lots of strange company policies, personal
choices and other constraints. Please refrain from making
ago some
jokester ( Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) sent a msg that read
If you want to have fun with Outlook Express users, put this in your signature:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[replace QUOTE with " ... I didn't know if were using a susceptible MUA]
which is a
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:03:20PM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
# On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:46:02PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote:
# Please do be kind with your fellow admins even if they do things you
# wouldn't do. Dropping a bomb such as that, *knowingly* is very
# unfriendly. No one
Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank
Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar abomination
and I won't show you the difference.
Recommended reading for obvious newbies like yourself:
http://learn.to/attribute/
http://learn.to/sign/
http://learn.to/edit_messages/
--
Robin S. Socha
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:19:27PM +0100,
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recommended reading for obvious newbies like yourself:
http://learn.to/attribute/
I took a look at the attribute page because I had had a recent discussion
with someone over whether or not date and/or time
Exactly my point...
I wouldn't say for myself, that I am a competent sysadmin... After all I
take care of only five servers running qmail on Linux...
The company I work for uses Exchange, so I am forced to use Outlook (2k). I
would use anything else, but the smtp port is closed to the outside...
.
Everyone needs to take a deep breath and just relax. The message I posted was
in the context of a discussion of certain types of legal addresses that mutt
didn't handle correctly. As an aside, I posted a message with an address in it
that caused Outlook Express to lock up. It didn't "de
martin langhoff wrote:
We are on the *internet*. Welcome.
Precisely. If you must use software that cannot handle the full spectrum
of demands the Internet presents, don't blame the Internet.
- Amitai
Well let's see.. Been Managing Unix systems for about 5 years now .. Did
start on Mac's then Windows then Unix so yeah I kinda went the long way
but I have been using Outlook Express almost since the beging.. It has
just been recently that I have started using other MUA's ... However I
don't
.
Pranksters usually enjoy the power of destruction they gain with a
little knowledge.
While I'm not a prankster, I find it unnecessary to refrain from
posting any text that may cause Outlook Express to crash. I am
operating within standards, and I forced no one to use a broken
MUA. Its
Just when you thought he couldn't possibly more clearly define the word
moronic through his typed dialogue...
jason
This email brought to you by Outlook Express - accept it
Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar abomination
and I won't show you the difference
Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the
Outlook Express program is making me crazy. I looked for a solution in the
archives, but i didn't find it. My problem is:
My clients use Microshit Outlook Express and i'm having a lot of error
messages from qmail pop server
/SERVER.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Dennis Duval wrote:
Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the
Outlook Express program is making me crazy. I looked for a solution in the
archives, but i
Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the
Outlook Express program is making me crazy. I looked for a solution in the
archives, but i didn't find it. My problem is:
My clients use Microshit Outlook Express and i'm having a lot of error
messages from qmail pop server
hi,
admin wrote:
Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the
how are you starting the pop3-daemon?
try a telnet mail.infomoney.com.br on port 110 from one of your client
workstation. is there a sudden response or a timeout?
and : what does the log say?(TM)
;) a
Hi everyone. I use the pop daemon from qmail (qmail-pop3d) and the
Outlook Express program is making me crazy.
Outlook makes everyone crazy.
Get yourself a real email program.
One that gives meaningful error messages.
What is happening?
Read your log files.
Felix
Iam Putting My problems again, Can anybody Help
Can anybody help!!!
I have qmail running on Linux 6.1 server , since last 5 months, As the
linux
users have increased qmail is rejecting to accept the mails sent through
outlook express with an attachments.?
What could be the problem
y, July 05, 2000 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: email error from outlook express
delete the file rcpthosts in /var/qmail/control
At 11:30 PM 7/5/2000 +0530, you wrote:
Sir here is the message displayed by outlookexpress when sending mails
to outside domains:
The message could not be sent b
Hello,
I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client.
Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp.
My setup:
Server: Running Linux 2.2.12-20, Redhat 6.1
Qmail-1.03
tcpserver out of ucspi-tcp-0.88
supervise out of daemontools-0.70
SMTP-AUTH patch:
http
, 2000 9:32:33 AM GMT
Subject: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5
Hello,
I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client.
Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp.
__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:52:05AM -0400, Denise Williams wrote:
Hi, I received mail from Krzysztof Dabrowski that solved my problem.
solution: /bin/checkpassword needs to be suid'ed to root for those systems
using shadow passwords.
Do not, EVER, do that. The moment you do, checkpassword
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 00, at 8:52, Denise Williams wrote:
solution: /bin/checkpassword needs to be suid'ed to root for those
systems using shadow passwords.
Don't do that! You have just created a target for a dictionary attack;
suid /bin/checkpassword is
Do not, EVER, do that. The moment you do, checkpassword becomes a /bin/su
replacement without any logging or limiting.
Don't you think that this histeric reaction is a bit too far?
checkpassword is certainly safer suid program that most of suids in your
system.
And another one:
Don't do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 00, at 15:31, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
Don't you think that this histeric reaction is a bit too far?
checkpassword is certainly safer suid program that most of suids in
your system.
No it is not. Any program which allows to
It's as simple as that.
so we finally need a good , versatile solution for it. Because a lot of
users have problems with it and not everyone wants to go ahead and patch
his way through qmail-smtpd.
Brush
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 00, at 15:49, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
so we finally need a good , versatile solution for it. Because a lot
of users have problems with it and not everyone wants to go ahead and
patch his way through qmail-smtpd.
I'm not completely
I'm not completely sure how the authenticated SMTP conversation
looks like. You have two possible approaches:
1. qmail-popup like. You start SMTP conversation as a root, grab a
username/password, verify it, drop root and go on. (That's what
qmail-popup - checkpassword - qmail-pop3d sequence
First, I have a perfectly functioning Qmail 1.03 to the
tune of about 20K messeges/day. So this is really a MUA
question, but geez, remember we're talking about
Microsoft here folks, get a straight answer?, unlikely.
So this is a more "have you ever encountered?"
Outlook Express
some problems.
If the mail is written in plain text-case of using pine, there
is no problem.
If I use outlook express, I can choose content type(html,
text)
and encoding methods(base 64, quoted printable,
7bits).
So when I choose 7bits, there is no problem.
But in other cases
an outlook-probs list. But maybe you can help me
in some way.
There are no solutions. You can forcefeed all incoming mail through a filter
which removes double dots. That will destroy some attachments.
You can tell people to use another mailer (all outlook express versions
suffer from this prob
Hi,
first of all. I'm subscribed to this list. So please no CCs to me.
The problem here isn't SSL, so let's not discuss that further.
Yes it's not SSL.
When I looked at the message using mutt, it turns out that
there was a series of dots, all on lines on their own, followed by a
line of
Cyril,
Have you ruled out problems with header compression and other PPP related
features of the dial-up connection? I have seen problems in other
applications clear up when features like header compression were turned
off.
Bob
Robert Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cyril Bitterich wrote:
hluss: 110, Secure (SSL): Nein, Serverfehler: 0x800CCC90,
Fehlernummer:
0x800420CD.
ME TOO!!! (okay, just kidding).
We have been having this problem for months with Outlook Express and
Outlook; in our case, the error message says something like "there was
an unexpected erro
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:43:29AM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
.
.
.
.
.
some text
This is a known and confirmed bug in various versions of outlook. To make
things worse, the bug only bites if the last packet contains just dots. To
make a sure way to cause trouble for LookOut ehr..
rverfehler: 0x800CCC90,
Fehlernummer:
0x800420CD.
The first line says that the messeage nr. 30 could not be retrieved,
then comes the outlook-express alias for that spezial connection and
then after the word
"Serverantwort:" some line that should be in one of the messages in the
/Maildir/new
Cyril Bitterich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever I'm trying to receive the E-Mails via telnet or Netscape there
is no Problem but using Outlook-Express the download always hangs with
message nr. 30.
Any hints?
I think you've solved the problem yourself. Tell them Outlook Express
imi Valley, CA 93065
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
- Original Message -
From: Adam D . McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cyril Bitterich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9 Sep 1999 14.28
Subject: Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express
Bitterich
Cc: Qmail
Subject: Re: Problems while downloading E-Mails with Outlook-Express
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 09:38:07PM +0200, Cyril Bitterich wrote:
Nachricht Nr. 30 konnte nicht abgerufen werden. Konto: 'gunnet ',
Server: 'pop gunnet.de', Protokoll: POP3, Serverantwort:
'Vielleicht sollte
y solution.
Best of luck.
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Cyril Bitterich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever I'm trying to receive the E-Mails via telnet or Netscape there
is no Problem but using Outlook-Express the download always hangs with
message nr. 30.
Any hints?
I think you
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 09:38:07PM +0200, Cyril Bitterich wrote:
The problem here isn't SSL, so let's not discuss that further. It's a
coincidence that this should be reported, because I had the same problem
a few days ago. Outlook crashed when retrieving a certain message from a
POP account.
Does anyone know if the qmail pop3 server (or any patches) support
the Outlook Express features to:
1) Leave a copy on the server
2) Delete copy after X days
Not surprisingly, people who set this option end up downloading
the same email every time they check pop, untill X days are over
Shouldn't be like that unless their copy of Outlook is broken. What's
the acronym ULID?
Ken Jones escribió:
Does anyone know if the qmail pop3 server (or any patches) support
the Outlook Express features to:
1) Leave a copy on the server
2) Delete copy after X days
Not surprisingly
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
Shouldn't be like that unless their copy of Outlook is broken. What's
the acronym ULID?
It's UIDL.
However, dollar to doughnuts that the guy is talking about some
proprietary MSexchange extension.
Could it be the IMAP server? I have several people (including myself)
running Outlook Express 4.72 which also wants an "Inbox" and I'm not getting
any errors. Our setup is qmail 1.03 with the patched for maildir UW Imap
server running both Maildirs and Mailboxs.
As for the suggestion o
I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to
Internet Standards...
Outlook Express version 5 has fixed most of my issues with IMAP bar this
one: Outlook creates a 'special' folder called Inbox.
From "INTERNET-DRAFT: IMAP4rev1", the proposed revision
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:03:08AM -0400, Dave Teske wrote:
As for the suggestion of a non MS client, I've looked at eudora and a few
others and they are actually worse. Eudora blows for Imap. It always wants
to show every file in the users dir even the . files. I was able to work
around it
It's close. The basic IMAP stuff is there, but their seems to be a problem
with extra folder support. Of course this could be the IMAP server fault
too. Also I'm not crazy about the UI but I'll have to play with it for
awhile.
Thanks for the tip
--Dave
I haven't tried it yet, but the latest
I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to
Internet Standards...
Outlook Express version 5 has fixed most of my issues with IMAP bar this
one: Outlook creates a 'special' folder called Inbox. This folder doesn't
exist on the IMAP server, so every synch
On Thursday, June 03, 1999 5:24 AM, Jim Gilliver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to
Internet Standards...
[...]
Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions for me?
Yes use something other than Microsoft
Hi there,
We're running qmail on linux with Outlook Express clients on Win95/8
(shudder). The server works perfectly running POP3 and SMTP, and it now
does user-controlled auto-forwarding (via an email-parsing .qmail generator
=) ).
Unfortunately, now we need a small group of computers
78 matches
Mail list logo
