Hi,
I've already installed:
Qmail 1.03+Vpopmail 4.10+sqwebmail+daemontools+ezmlm+autoresond+ucspi
(PHWEW!)
and I was wondering what would happen if I patched a brand new qmail 1.03
with the qmailqueue patch (I want to use virus scanning) and installed the
patched qmail over itself. Would I
board master [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already installed:
Qmail 1.03+Vpopmail 4.10+sqwebmail+daemontools+ezmlm+autoresond+ucspi
(PHWEW!)
and I was wondering what would happen if I patched a brand new qmail 1.03
with the qmailqueue patch (I want to use virus scanning
with the qmailqueue patch (I want to use virus scanning) and installed the
patched qmail over itself. Would I lose anything? Files, configurations,
etc?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail-queue will slow down mail processing (did in my case) so if its a
medium/high volume smtp server then you better plan for some additional
bogomips to fire off the scanning.
Note that the QMAILQUEUE patch alone should not increase server load by
any
case) so if its a
medium/high volume smtp server then you better plan for some additional
bogomips to fire off the scanning.
Note that the QMAILQUEUE patch alone should not increase server load by
any measurable amount; it's whatever you run using QMAILQUEUE (i.e. a
virus scanner or other mail
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
than the obvious overhead of adding /bin/sh to the execution path? Is
this overhead significant enough to make such a modification a bad idea?
Are there quoting problems to expect? If yes, I would leave the patch
the way it is now.
Regards, Frank
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 10:26:28PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
I've been contemplating rewriting the patch to do an exec of
{ /bin/sh, -c, $QMAILQUEUE } instead of exec'ing $QMAILQUEUE as-is.
This would allow for putting the contents of the script named by
$QMAILQUEUE (which is frequently a
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 08:21:13AM +0200, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
than the obvious overhead of adding /bin/sh to the execution path? Is
this overhead significant enough to make such a modification a bad idea?
Are there quoting problems to expect?
I vote to leave it alone. Let the configuring individual invoke
/bin/sh in QMAILQUEUE herself if she understands and still wants to
make that particular convenience vs. overhead tradeoff.
Valued at $0.02,
JS
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 10:26:28PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
I've been
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:37:21PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Appended is a patch to qmail-1.03 that causes any program that would run
qmail-queue to look for an environment variable QMAILQUEUE. If it is
present, it is used in place of the string bin/qmail-queue when
running qmail-queue.
How do I know/find out if my system has the qmailqueue patch that is
required to enable qmail to call a different qmail-queue program than the
one compiled in by default? Where would I find this information?
Joy Hundley
Internet Services
Service Transport
800-528-1616 ext. 240
Visit us
Joy Hundley writes:
How do I know/find out if my system has the qmailqueue patch that is
required to enable qmail to call a different qmail-queue program than the
one compiled in by default? Where would I find this information?
strings /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd | grep QMAILQUEUE
Or look
the firewall) mail server at either failure.
At both times, the mail server was running happily with the qmailqueue patch
for months.
At the first failure, I tried queue-fix, re-creating the /var/qmail/queue
dirs, and changing the QMAILQUEUE env variable from pointing to our
virus filter to its
Hi:
I would like to write some scripts to rewrite headers on incoming messages
received through qmail. I patched qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch, and now it
works OK. I know that Bruce Guenter's qmail-qfilter could be helpful here,
bit I would like to use QMAILQUEUE directly by now.
The question
jdomingo == jdomingo Jos writes:
jdomingo I'm sure this script is quite simple (maybe just opening
jdomingo a couple of fd from which to read the messages from),
jdomingo but I'd like to get a working script to build on it and
jdomingo learn (a bash script would be perfect :).
Hi everyone:
I can't make qmail-queue patch work: I always get 451 unable to exec qq
(#4.3.0) when finishing DATA with a . on a line by itself (telnet to port
25). The interesting part is, whenever QMAILQUEUE environment variable is
set, no matter its value, the mail doesn't end in qmail-queue.
hello all,
trying to implement the the qmail-qfilter patch and the only thing I've
been able to do is cause 4.5.1's all day (unable to exec qq).
What's the trick?
Searched the archives and nothing came close... ANY ideas???
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to implement the the qmail-qfilter patch and the only thing I've
been able to do is cause 4.5.1's all day (unable to exec qq).
What's the trick?
Searched the archives and nothing came close... ANY ideas???
There were several people running
I have softlimit -m 400 at the start of the qmail-smtpd script
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to implement the the qmail-qfilter patch and the
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have softlimit -m 400 at the start of the qmail-smtpd script
I seem to recall the others had to raise it to at least 6MB to get it to work.
This should be in the archives in the last month; I believe the subject had
something to do with Amavis,
Hi all
I am trying to use qmail-scanner with qmail, and have recompiled with
the QMAILQUEUE patch. My qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file looks
like:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -i qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" export QMAILQUEUE
exe
Anyone having qq error messages when implementing qmailqueue patch??
Specificall 4.5.1/4.5.0??
I'm trying to filter e-mail using qmail-qfilter and get frequent errors.
Searched the qmail archive and most there was some talk about softlimit
but nothing definative...
Anyone getting
Como faço para aplicar este path?
Flavio Alberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Como faço para aplicar este path?
Babelfish gives the following translation: "How I make to apply this path?"
If that's a reasonable translation, you want to download the qmail source,
change into the top level-directory of it, and then execute
Hi, after sending my last message something happend and qmail stopped
delivering local mail:
Oct 25 02:02:33 be-01 qmail: 972439353.047394 starting delivery 258: msg
134477
to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 25 02:02:33 be-01 qmail: 972439353.047854 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Oct 25 02:02:33
Milen Petrinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to install qmail-scanner, but it requires the QMAILQUEUE patch to
be installed. I followed the link on qmail.org, but I found a text that looks
like mail message with attachment. Can anybody answer how to download and
install the patch
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:26:16AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
I assume you're talking about Bruce Guenter's QMAILQUEUE patch, which can be
found at http://www.em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-qfilter/current/ .
Actually, the QMAILQUEUE patch is at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail+patches/sources
Thank you all for the help. Unfortunetly after following the instructions in
your mails qmail-scanner still don't want to compile - it says "can't find
evidence of QMAILQUEUE patch in qmail-smtpd!". I can't figure where is the
problem - in applying the patch or in compiling the scanner?
Milen
Jason Haar escribió:
I got the QMAILQUEUE patch the other day so I could get scan4virus working.
When I tried running the patch on the qmail source, it failed out. Could this
be because I used the DNS qmail patch? If so, should I
Yes this is why it failed.
Anybody knowns
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:16:20PM +0200, J.J.Gallardo wrote:
I got the QMAILQUEUE patch the other day so I could get scan4virus working.
When I tried running the patch on the qmail source, it failed out. Could this
be because I used the DNS qmail patch? If so, should I
Yes this is why
Michael French [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 19 September 2000 at 23:33:44
-0400
I was afraid of just "eyeballing it" and really screwing it up. No, I
don't know exactly what I am doing, I am LEARNING, that is why I asked for
help with a qmail related issue which is what I thought the
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 12:33:03PM -0400, French, Michael wrote:
I got the QMAILQUEUE patch the other day so I could get scan4virus
working. When I tried running the patch on the qmail source, it failed out.
...
Could this be because I used the DNS qmail patch? If so, should I
how would you apply more than one patch then?
wolfgang
Also sprach Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 20.09.2000:
Yes this is why it failed. As is usually the case, patches are against
UNTOUCHED sources.
sday, September 19, 2000 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: QMAILQUEUE patch
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 12:33:03PM -0400, French, Michael wrote:
I got the QMAILQUEUE patch the other day so I could get scan4virus
working. When I tried running the patch on the qmail source, it failed
out.
...
Could this be be
Saw that someone posted a question about it last Friday, but it was
not answered. I searched through the archives for the answer, but could not
find it so I am going to ask again.
I got the QMAILQUEUE patch the other day so I could get scan4virus
working. When I tried running
Hi,
I am tryint to get
http://www.qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch
to work - with little success. I downloaded qmail-1.03 from the
www.qmail.org site, and then the patch. One would assume a somewhat
sanitised work environment. This is the output of the patch process.
# patch -p0 qmailqueue
they are - as i said its sporadic in many ways - it works for some hosts
but not others (I have servers serial mailing' into this box)
this host doesn't work though
Eric
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 07:13:29PM -0700, Eric Peters wrote:
First off it
the problem environment,
though.
Josh
Eric Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/14/2000 09:32:12 AM
To: Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QMAILQUEUE Patch qmail-qfilter 451 qq internal bug
(#4.3.0)
they are - as i said its sporadic
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:51:34AM -0700, Eric Peters wrote:
I have made the qmail-filterq script (the one that immediately calls the
qmail-qfilter) so it doesn't actually pass onto anything (there isn't a
log_sent) and it still gives that error as of yet I havn't found where
there is a
permissions are 755, only certain clients,
168.100.206.150:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/usr/local/bin/qmail-filterq"
and i have the pasted the contents of the qmail-filterq file already too
the loggin works on some hosts that connect up via serialmail to relay its
only some hosts that
For some added confusion I put the softlimit command in after the
supervise and it didn't help
it DEFINATELY looks to be some type of limit thing though
because
[root@ecamp /root]# telnet ecamp.net 25
Trying 168.100.187.53...
Connected to ecamp.net. Escape character is '^]'.
220 ecamp.net
First off it probably doesn't have anything at all to do with QMAILQUEUE
just laying the foundation down for the implementation
this seems to only be happening on some hosts and I can't figure out what
the uniqueness is
and the 451 qq internal bug doesn't tell me much when i look at the
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 07:13:29PM -0700, Eric Peters wrote:
First off it probably doesn't have anything at all to do with QMAILQUEUE
just laying the foundation down for the implementation
the qmail-smtpd.cdb is populated based upon
Hi,
I would like to patch qmail with
http://www.qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch
where can I find out an howto to do it
without breaking all my server ?
Thanks !
Octave
--
Amicalement,
oCtAvE
Connexion terminée par expiration du délai d'attente
Hi!!
I have tried to install the qmailqueue patch a couple of times. But when
I try to send mail through SMTP I keep getting "qq internal bug" all the
time.
I have done the following things:
1. Applied the qmailqueue patch to qmail-1.03 source. (no error messages)
2. Recompiled and r
At 15:38 06/04/2000 +, Jennifer Tippens wrote:
Hello,
I'm having difficulty with the qmailqueue patch
(http://www.qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch) I'm not sure if I'm doing it
correctly, as I have not had to patch anything before. I copied the patch
part of the text to a file on my box
Hello,
I'm having difficulty with the qmailqueue patch
(http://www.qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch) I'm not sure if I'm doing it correctly, as I
have not had to patch anything before. I copied the patch part of the text to a file
on my box and called it qmailqueue-patch and put it into a newly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having difficulty with the qmailqueue patch
(http://www.qmail.org/qmailqueue-patch) I'm not sure if I'm doing it
correctly, as I have not had to patch anything before. I copied the
patch part of the text to a file on my box and called it
qmailqueue-patch and put
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 18:16:40 -0500 , Juan E Suris writes:
I am interested in implementing this patch, but I am not sure how to do it.
I am thinking of writing a wrapper around qmail-queue that reads the message
and envelope, does all the necessary changes and forwards it to qmail-queue.
What
I am interested in implementing this patch, but I am not sure how to do it.
I am thinking of writing a wrapper around qmail-queue that reads the message
and envelope, does all the necessary changes and forwards it to qmail-queue.
What I don't know how to do is how to setup my wrapper to talk to
Greetings.
Appended is a patch to qmail-1.03 that causes any program that would run
qmail-queue to look for an environment variable QMAILQUEUE. If it is
present, it is used in place of the string "bin/qmail-queue" when
running qmail-queue. This could be used, for example, to add a program
into
51 matches
Mail list logo
