> > http://www.fibrespeed.net/code/spamcheck.tar.gz
>
> 404
Thanks ...
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/code/spamcheck.tar.gz
--
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:02:23AM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> I've written a filter in Python that scans for Received: lines and
> checks IP addresses found therein against a configurable list of
> RBL type services. It is in beta stages and definately under
> development, but it is very
Michael T. Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've written a filter in Python that scans for Received: lines and
> checks IP addresses found therein against a configurable list of
> RBL type services. It is in beta stages and definately under
> development, but it is very functional (doesn't cr
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:55:07PM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2001, Scott Gifford wrote:
>
> > No, they just split it up, to make it easier to pick and choose the
> > parts of ORBS that you want to use.
>
> Also I must add to my blacklist the new ORBS addresses to avoid
> to s
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:47:06AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> Hello
>
> > This may seem dumb but here goes :).
> > Now, does it mean that we can no longer use it to check for open relays and
> > if so what replacement do we have?
>
> I had said about the mor free time!!!
>
> But is this
On 9 Feb 2001, Scott Gifford wrote:
> No, they just split it up, to make it easier to pick and choose the
> parts of ORBS that you want to use.
Also I must add to my blacklist the new ORBS addresses to avoid
to scan smtp of my servers
Thanks for info
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz
"Andrew Wafula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I was at the ORBS site the other day and I saw that as from 1st Feb 2001
> relays.orbs.org would be deleted.
>
> This may seem dumb but here goes :).
> Now, does it mean that we can no longer use it to check for open
> relays
No, the
Hello
> This may seem dumb but here goes :).
> Now, does it mean that we can no longer use it to check for open relays and
> if so what replacement do we have?
I had said about the mor free time!!!
But is this really true, that ORBS has been closed permanently?
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, asantos wrote:
> I think this is interesting for this list:
>
> http://slashdot.org/yro/00/12/13/1853237.shtml
That's a mail policy issue, not a mail server issue. Consider taking
RBL-related issues to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's certainly on-topic for that list. It'll
I think I entered the names that I got off of the anti-spam doc on qmail.org.
I could have messed up also, thanks for the corrections.
At 11:32 AM 11/20/00 -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > msci.memphis.edu
>
>This should be relays.msci.memphis.edu.
>
>How did you enter these domains?
>Why did you en
> msci.memphis.edu
This should be relays.msci.memphis.edu.
How did you enter these domains?
Why did you enter both
dul.maps.vix.com
and
dialups.mail-abuse.org
What is the difference?
Mate
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> It's too bad that companies can't set up two systems... one for people
> who don't want to receive this spam crap and one for customers who lack
> clue.
As well as us who actually want to collect spam (for research and
investigati
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jon Rust wrote:
> Just got a call from an angry MSN user.
> http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,,8_512791,00.html
> jon
It's too bad that companies can't set up two systems... one for people
who don't want to receive this spam crap and one for customers who lack
e
dupes?
-Dave
>-Original Message-
>From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:05 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RBL
>
>
>Mike Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>First I did this setup and it did not work .
&g
Not sure about anyone else, however this is about the 30th time I have
received
this message.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RBL
Mike Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>First I did this setup and it did not work .
>tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
>rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
>setuser qmaill cyclog \
>-s100 -n5 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
>
>[root@black(/var/log)]: s
Believe me, I've been very tempted to blackhole .jp, .kr and don't forget
.co.uk or .it but then I realized, for the most port the spam originates
from the U.S. and uses an open relay in these countries to spam.
I think the long term goal is to educate the admins of these foreign
domains. A good
* Michael T Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have a program that does the checks rblsmtpd does, except
> that it allows the modification of the message header instead of
> blocking the mail?
Procmail, preferably in conjunction with rblcheck:
http://www.procmail.org/jari/pm-tips-b
You misunderstood the statement. rblsmtpd is now part of the ucspi-tcp
package. See: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> Am i to understand that rblsmtpd's devlopment has ceased? I think DJB's
> page says some mention of that, and also instru
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On 30 Aug 2000, at 8:24, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
|
| > Am i to understand that rblsmtpd's devlopment has ceased? I think
| > DJB's page says some mention of that, and also instructs that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30 Aug 2000, at 8:24, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> Am i to understand that rblsmtpd's devlopment has ceased? I think
> DJB's page says some mention of that, and also instructs that the
> functionality has been introduced into tcpserver now.
If you use a caching nameserver, frequent domains will automatically be
cached for a given amount of time. If you read the entire website for the
RBL (or other related lists) you'll find that they have subscription options
... basically you'd set yourself up as a slave server that downloads the
The part I was zeroing in on was that you needed to sign a waiver to use
the RBL. That is incorrect. You need to sign a waiver if you get the
zone file via DNS zone transfers.
I'm using RBL now and didn't sign a thing but I don't use the zone
file.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 10:44:49AM -0400,
Paul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, RBL onlt requires that you do that if you want certian levels of
> filtering (namely DNS).
>
> uscpi-tcp-88 has RBL built in.. www.qmail.org
But this program does a remote lookup each time. The original ques
No, RBL onlt requires that you do that if you want certian levels of
filtering (namely DNS).
uscpi-tcp-88 has RBL built in.. www.qmail.org
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 08:49:48AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
! There are ways to get complete copies of some other RBL styled lists.
Indeed. DJB himself said as much on the dns list:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=95836494819286
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:04:59PM +0200,
TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
> instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
> things up - I also know that the list is updated all the time - but can
Tonino,
I think I spoke too soon (only on my first cup of coffee)... Specific entries
will have been cached if they have been seen before, but not necessarily the
whole list. However, you can use DNS to get the complete list: see
http://maps.vix.com/rbl/usage.html.
Henry
> Henry Baragar wrote
Henry Baragar wrote:
>
> Tonino,
>
> The RBL uses DNS, so if your DNS server is local then it is caching copies
> of the RBL list locally.
>
> Henry
>
> TAG wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
> > instead of trying to get it from th
Tonino,
The RBL uses DNS, so if your DNS server is local then it is caching copies
of the RBL list locally.
Henry
TAG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
> instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
> things up
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> What method of RBL are you trying to use? The standard qmail method
> requires running rblsmtpd, which I don't see you doing. There were
> some old patches to integrate the functionality into qmail; were you
> using those instead?
I was trying th
Noah Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 11 November 1999 at 14:43:25 -0800
> I am trying to set up the RBL for the first time. It just is *not*
> working. OK, first, here is the recommended startup line from the web
> site:
> tcpserver 0 25 tcpcontrol /etc/smtp.cdb /usr/local/bin/smtplog
Hi Doug,
> What is the *best* means to use the RBL, DUL, Shubs, and others, with
> qmail-smtpd and be able to allow our dialups to relay?
tcpserver/tcprules will take care of the selective relaying, and rblsmtpd
(available from ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/pub/software/) will handle RBL
for you
E
Robin Bowes writes:
> Joel Eriksson wrote:
> >
> > Have you ever heard about symlink-in-tmp problems?.. That is a classic mistake.
>
> Erm, I haven't. Where would I read about such things, and other
> "classic" mistakes?
BUGTRAQ.
P.S. Your mail2news gateway is broken.
--
Sam
Joel Eriksson wrote:
>
> Have you ever heard about symlink-in-tmp problems?.. That is a classic mistake.
Erm, I haven't. Where would I read about such things, and other
"classic" mistakes?
R.
--
Two rules to success in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
-- Sassan Tat
>anyway, thats what the BS in ORBS stands for, Behavor
>modification System.
I had an experience like this. I moved my email activity over to my
own LAN, using qmail, from my newly upgraded account with a "real" ISP,
using sendmail and fetchmail to do the ISP-related activity (via PPP
dial-up on
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> > > > rm ~/.rbltmp.bak
> > > Has anyone managed to get this to run?
> > > My /bin/sh doesn't do ~ expansion
> > > and the awk line appears tohave syntax errors with either the "
> > > or the ` or both.
> > Traditional bourne shells did not do tilde ex
Tim Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 24 March 1999 at 03:18:37 -0600
> On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 07:55:05PM -0500, xs wrote:
> > as anyone had the pleasure of dealing with some of the (excuse the
> > language) ass pirates that refuse to fix their MTA(s) or work to get their
> > sites taken out
Pavel V. Piankov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 24 March 1999 at 14:43:47 +0300
>
> Hi,
> it looks like you have a very special Unix tho (:
> the scriptie worked fine for me.
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:48:25AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> > Has anyone managed to get this to run?
>
sorry i didn't include too much more information about this.
it's use is as follows:
./rblstats.sh log.file
(where log.file is where you have daemon logs (for rblsmtpd) going).
as for the awk problem, this was tested on a FreeBSD and Linux box, both
of which are using GNUawk (gawk). try replacin
> > > rm ~/.rbltmp.bak
> > Has anyone managed to get this to run?
> > My /bin/sh doesn't do ~ expansion
> > and the awk line appears tohave syntax errors with either the "
> > or the ` or both.
> Traditional bourne shells did not do tilde expansion. The newer sh that
> comes with OS's like FreeBSD
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:48:25AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> > blocked."
> > echo "Great Hunt."
> > rm ~/.rbltmp.bak
> > #EOF
>
> Has anyone managed to get this to run?
> My /bin/sh doesn't do ~ expansion
> and the awk line appears tohave syntax errors with either the "
> or the ` or both.
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 07:55:05PM -0500, xs wrote:
> as anyone had the pleasure of dealing with some of the (excuse the
> language) ass pirates that refuse to fix their MTA(s) or work to get their
> sites taken out of the ORBS, RBL, DSSL, or DUL databases?
We haven't had these types of complai
Hi,
it looks like you have a very special Unix tho (:
the scriptie worked fine for me.
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:48:25AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> Has anyone managed to get this to run?
> My /bin/sh doesn't do ~ expansion
> and the awk line appears tohave syntax errors with either the "
>
> hey all, here is a quickie little program i wrote to see exactly what
> rblsmtp is doing for you, here is an example of the output:
> #!/bin/sh
> echo "RBL-Stats v1.0 by xs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> echo ""
> echo "checking your logfile, this'll take a few."
> cat $1|grep rblsmtp > ~/.rbltmp.bak
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
