Re: any comment on this line

2000-10-24 Thread Dave Sill
"Yamin Prabudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >ORBS sez: >... As ! is >a standard network addressing indicator, this can only be charitably >described as yet another Qmail bug. qmail's handling of !'s in not in violation of any of the mail RFC's. >Qmail is extremely network unfriendly >and has bee

Re: any comment on this line

2000-10-23 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Yamin Prabudy" on Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:31:42 +0700: > My friend forwad it to me from http://www.orbs.org/otherresource.html The URL is actually: http://www.orbs.org/otherresources.html I suggest you read it and then take your pick which you want to use... When qmail is configured p

Re: any comment on this line

2000-10-23 Thread Brett Randall
> "Yamin" == Yamin Prabudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Please read the archives or we may have to shoot you. They are there for a reason. http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000/ -- "Pascal, n.: A programming language named after a man who would turn over in his grave if he knew about it." - The

any comment on this line

2000-10-23 Thread Yamin Prabudy
My friend forwad it to me from http://www.orbs.org/otherresource.html a.. Qmail admins: Qmail's current version is insecure by default. Most admins know enough to follow the instructions for securing it before putting qmail into service, however it usually drops ORBS test messages checking for UU