On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:14:00PM -0400, Mark Douglas wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work.
You may need GNU patch, binary called gpatch on BSD systems if installed.
--
* Henning
Title: big-concurrency patch
I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any documentation for it, and the patch file itself seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1 big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any documentation for
it, and the patch file itself seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best
to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1
big-concurrency.patch it asks me what
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it doesn't help.
Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch, would you tell me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is that same patch muddled in with the e-mail
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it doesn't help.
Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch, would you tell
me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is that same patch
muddled in with the e-mail
to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1
big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I want to patch.
Strictly speaking, it's /possible/ that your version of patch is getting
screwed up by the email header. Try removing everything above the first
'diff' line. Then
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the test you're doing from a solaris system? At this point I'm just kind of wondering what the problem
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:14:00PM -0400, Mark Douglas allegedly wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
test you're doing from a solaris system? At this point I'm just kind of
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
test you're doing from a solaris system?
Nope, Linux. Perhaps the version of patch which Sun ships is
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:25:58PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Mark Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
test you're doing from a solaris
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
What operating system are you compiling on? maybe
you want to try another version of patch from ftp.gnu.org. Because the same thing happened
to me when i compiled on solaris 8 and using another version of patch
helped.
Hope it works for you
Paul
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
Sorry, maybe you are in the wrong directory? you
should not be in the qmail-1.03 dir. because the patch specifies the path
already "qmail-1.03/file-to-patch". so if you are in the qmail dir , do a "cd
.." and try the patch again. if
Setting up /var/qmail1, /var/qmail2, etc. each with a concurrency of, say,
100, as opposed to one install of qmail with the big concurrency remote
patch with concurrency set to 500.
Apparently you have to adjust the linux kernel to get your concurrency up to
500 so wouldn't it be easier to just
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:31:52PM -0700, Brett wrote:
Setting up /var/qmail1, /var/qmail2, etc. each with a concurrency of, say,
100, as opposed to one install of qmail with the big concurrency remote
patch with concurrency set to 500.
This might, IMHO, have some advantages, especially if
and big-concurrency patch ?
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a text file, rite. But the 1st few lines looks like a readme. why
? Can i just save the file as 'big-todo.103.patch' in my qmail server
and run the patch.
Yes. Patch is pretty smart about that sort of thing
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I check whether the patch was successfully installed or not ?
Patch will exit with no errors.
--
Todd A. Jacobs
CodeGnome Consulting, LTD
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a text file, rite. But the 1st few lines looks like a readme. why
? Can i just save the file as 'big-todo.103.patch' in my qmail server
and run the patch.
Yes. Patch is pretty smart about that sort of thing. :)
--
Todd A. Jacobs
CodeGnome
Hi,
I've come across the above patch that is suppose make qmail able to handle more
outgoing emails than the default setting.
1. Where to get it ?
2. How to install it ?
Rgds
Ronnie (ext 3210)
MCP, MCP+I, MCSE
This
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Where to get it ?
http://qmail.valueclick.com/qmail/big-todo.103.patch
2. How to install it ?
Halt qmail. Run patch on the patchfile (probably 'patch -p0
big-todo.103.patch' from within your qmail-1.03 source directory) and then
'make make
Chee Weng, Ronnie
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to add big-todo and big-concurrency patch ?
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Where to get it ?
http://qmail.valueclick.com/qmail/big-todo.103.patch
2. How to install it ?
Halt qmail. Run patch on the patchfile (probably
20 matches
Mail list logo
