Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-11 Thread Mr. Christopher F. Miller
Yes, it is your distribution so you could use whatever uids/gids you want. However, that will make changing systems to and from it and adding packages from other package managers to it difficult and error prone. I'd strongly suggest you use the same userspace as one of the major distributions.

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-11 Thread Kevin Waterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since this will be your distribution, you can just reserve the qmail uids. In this case, you can get away with a very simple spec file to build qmail (I can tell you if you need it). That would be most helpful But you might be concerned about people who would like

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-10 Thread Russell Nelson
Kevin Waterson writes: I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely. of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later. I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and var-qmail packages. Ask redhat to change the dependency from

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-10 Thread Mirko Zeibig
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 08:42:08AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote: Kevin Waterson writes: I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely. of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later. I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-10 Thread Frank D. Cringle
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kevin Waterson writes: I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely. of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later. I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and var-qmail packages.

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-10 Thread Kevin Waterson
Sam wrote: That has been the case at least since 4.0. The problem is that Red Hat's installer forces a sendmail install no matter what, even if another package provides smtpdaemon. Yes, but in this case I have removed the sendmail rpms from the distro Kevin

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-10 Thread Kevin Waterson
David Harris wrote: If you are going to be installing a bunch of machines, you might invest in modifying the base package by modifying the installer's package groupings so that qmail is installed instead of sendmail. You see, sendmail is in the "base" group which is always installed. If

Re: qmail distro and UID

1999-09-10 Thread mw
What should I use in the way of var-qmail. My understanding is that it needs to be compiled on each machine, but as this is a fresh install, but maybe used for upgrades, I am concerned about UID's. Should I simply create a .rpm from the source supplied or can someone recommend a better method.

qmail distro and UID

1999-09-09 Thread Kevin Waterson
I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely. of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later. I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and var-qmail packages. If I use the qmail-run-4-4.i386.rpm functions-3-3.i386.rpm What should I